A Theoretical Evaluation of Enabling Humans with Social Justice, Conceptualism, and Sustainable Development
- 1 Department of Economics, Thiruvalluvar University, Serkkadu, Katpadi Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
The approach to human growth is to expand the wealth of life, not only the wealth of the economy in which people live. It is a people-driven approach with their choices and opportunities. People can be transforming agents if they have the power to act. However, if they remain out of touch, if essential technical technologies are not available and if they are estranged from nature, they are less inclined or are less able to do so in ways that address social forces and the plan for societal imbalances. Equal opportunity is medium, partly because the recognized disparity is mirrored in influential asymmetries. Nature management echoes the often unexpected voices of indigenous peoples and the numerous groups and cultures that view people as part of the web of world life. In human development, disparities not only symbolize unfairness and social imbalances that might destabilize mankind, affect people’s happiness and self esteem but also contribute to people’s environmental effect. The largest number of contribution from higher human development countries is concentrated without completely internalizing the costs. The management of nature requires the commitment and willingness of millions of individuals throughout the world, including leaders of all social sectors. As a result, the current study focuses primarily on a theoretical assessment of human potential for social justice, conceptualism, and sustainable development, all of which are desperately required and important to society.
- Anand, S., & Sen, A (2000a). Human Development and Economic Sustainability. World Development, 28, 2029-2049. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00071-1
- Anand, S., & Sen, A (2000b). The Income Component of the Human Development Index. Journal of Human Development, 1, 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880050008782
- Ballard, D. (2005). Using Learning Processes to Promote Change for Sustainable Development. Action Research, 3, 135-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750305052138
- Barbier, E. B. (2010). Poverty, Development, and Environment. Environment and Development Economics, 15, 635-660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1000032X
- Barbier, E. B. (2016). Sustainability and Development. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 8, 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095227
- Burton, I., & Kates, R. W. (1986). The Great Climacteric, 1798-2048: The Transition to a Just and Sustainable Human Environment. In R. W. Kates, & I. Burton (Eds.), Geography, Resources, and Environment (pp. 339-360). University of Chicago Press.
- Chhibber, A. (2020). Variations on the HDI for the Anthropogenic: Broadening the Vista. Background Paper for Human Development Report 2020, United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report Office.
- Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
- Cortese, A. D. (2003). The Critical Role of Higher Education in Creating a Sustainable Future. Planning for Higher Education, 31, 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(92)90024-M
- Daly, H. E. (1992). Allocation, Distribution, and Scale: Towards an Economics That Is Efficient, Just, and Sustainable. Ecological Economics, 6, 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(92)90024-M
- Dasgupta, P. (2001). Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247889.001.0001
- Jiang, X. (2008). Towards an Internationalization of Higher Education from a Critical perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32, 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770802395561
- Nagoya Declaration on Higher Education for Sustainable Development (2014, November). http://www.c-linkage.com/for/hesd/declaration.html