Relationship between BMPN, GSE-6, UWES-9, and EENDEED, a Nine-Item Instrument for Measuring Traditional Workplace and Remote Employee Engagement — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Relationship between BMPN, GSE-6, UWES-9, and EENDEED, a Nine-Item Instrument for Measuring Traditional Workplace and Remote Employee Engagement
School of Business, Technology, and Health Care Administration, Capella University, Minneapolis, USA
,
Lartey Research & Management, Marietta, USA
1 School of Business, Technology, and Health Care Administration, Capella University, Minneapolis, USA
EENDEED (Enhanced Engagement Nurtured by Determination, Efficacy, and Exchange Dimensions) is an instrument for measuring the engagement of both remote workers and traditional workplace employees. The purpose of this study was to validate the relationship between EENDEED and its three main theories, namely : 1) self-determination theory, 2) self-efficacy theory, and 3) social-exchange theory. This was done by looking at the relationships between EENDEED and three validated instruments: a) Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN), b) General Self-Efficacy scale (GSE-6), and c) Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9), that are based respectively on self-determination theory, self-efficacy theory, and social exchange theory. Data were collected from 600 participants in the United States through an online survey. A structural equation model (SEM) was created to ascertain the relationship between EENDEED and the three validated instruments, thus their subtending theories. Findings suggested the existence of positive significant relationships between engagement as measured by EENDEED and BMPN, SGE-6, and UWES-9. Results indicated that for every 1 standard unit increase in the employee engagement as measured by EENDEED, there was an expectation to see an increase in BMPN, GSE-6, and UWES-9 scores by .55, .85, and .82 standard points respectively. This study provided support for external validity of EENDEED and confirmed the existence of positive and significant relationships between engagement of remote employees and traditional office workers as measured by EENDEED and 1) self-determination as measu red by BMPN, 2) self-efficacy as measured by SGE-6, and 3) social exchange-based engagement as measured by UWES-9.
Adkins, A. (2015). Majority of U.S. Employees Not Engaged Despite Gains in 2014. http://www.gallup.com/poll/181289/majority-employees-notengaged-despite-gains-2014.aspx
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2007). Albert Bandura. In G. Lindzey, & W. M. Runyan (Eds.), A History of Psychology in Autobiography (Vol. 9, pp. 43-75). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11571-002
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-Determination Theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 416-436). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
Dvorak, N., & Sasaki, J. (2017). Employees at Home: Less Engaged. http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/207539/employees-home-lessengaged.aspx/banner.html
Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Flores, M. F. (2019). Understanding The Challenges of Remote Working and Its Impact to Workers. International Journal of Business Marketing Management, 4, 40-44. http://www.ijbmm.com
Gajendran, R. S., Harrison, D. A., & Delaney-Klinger, K. (2015). Are Telecommuters Remotely Good Citizens? Unpacking Telecommuting’s Effects on Performance via Ideals and Job Resources. Personnel Psychology, 68, 353-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12082
Griswold, A. (2014). 3 Strategies for Getting a Promotion When You Work from Home. http://www.businessinsider.com/remote-workers-promotions2014-3
Guay, F., Senécal, C., Gauthier, L., & Fernet, C. (2003). Predicting Career Indecision: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.165
Jose, G., & Mampilly, S. R. (2012). Satisfaction with HR Practices and Employee Engagement: A Social Exchange Perspective. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4, 423-430. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v4i7.343 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790288_%27Satisfaction_with_HR_Practices_and_Employee_Engagement_A_Social_Exchange_Perspective%27_Journal_of_Economics_and_Behavioural_Studies_7_Vol_4_July_2012
Lartey, F. M. (2021). Impact of Career Planning, Employee Autonomy, and Manager Recognition on Employee Engagement. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 9, 135-158. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2021.92010
Lartey, F. M., & Randall, P. M. (2021a). Indicators of Computer-Mediated Communication Affecting Remote Employee Engagement. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 9, 82-92. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2021.91006
Lartey, F. M., & Randall, P. M. (2021b). From the Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN) to Employee Engagement: Indicators That Matter. International Business Research, 14, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v14n6p99
Lartey, F. M., & Randall, P. M. (2022). Enhanced Engagement Nurtured by Determination, Efficacy, and Exchange Dimensions (EENDEED): A Nine-Item Instrument for Measuring Traditional Workplace and Remote Employee Engagement. International Business Research, 15, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v15n2p1
Legault, L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1162-1
Purzer, S. (2011). The Relationship between Team Discourse, Self-Efficacy, and Individual Achievement: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00031.x
Randall, P. M., Lartey, F. M., & Tate, T. D. (2020). Enterprise Social Media (ESM) Use and Employee Belongingness in US Corporations. Journal of Human Resource Management, 8, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.201200803.12
Romppel, M., Herrmann-Lingen, C., Wachter, R., Edelmann, F., Düngen, H., Pieske, B., & Gesine Grande, G. (2013). General Self-Efficacy Scale—Short Form (GSE-6) [Database Record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t69316-000
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_SDT.pdf
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Sheldon, K. M., & Hilpert, J. C. (2012). The Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN) Scale: An Alternative Domain General Measure of Need Satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 439-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4
Soper, D. (2021). A-Priori Sample Size for Structural Equation Models Calculator. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
Taber K. T. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Van Yperen, N. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & De Jonge, K. M. (2014). Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work. PLoS ONE, 9, Article ID: e102921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102921