Bridging the Gap: Improving Agentic AI with Strong and Safe Data Practices
- 1 CSAA Insurance Group, Glendale, AZ, USA
- 2 Innova Solutions, Atlanta, GA, USA
Abstract
Agentic AI represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence, enabling proactive agents that can set goals, make decisions, and adapt to changing situations. However, the performance of these systems is heavily dependent on the quality and relevance of the data they process. This research highlights the critical risk posed by faulty, insecure, or contextually inappropriate input data in modern Agentic AI systems. To address this challenge, this study proposes the Autonomous Data Integrity Layer (ADIL). This flexible architecture integrates best practices from security engineering and data science to ensure that Agentic AI systems operate with clean, validated, and contextually relevant data. By focusing on data integrity, ADIL enhances the reliability, accountability, and effectiveness of Agentic AI systems, leading to more trustworthy and robust intelligent agents.
- Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2020) The Fourth Edition of Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson.
- Park, Y., et al. (2023) Creating Self-Sufficient AI: Goals, Independence, and Alignment with Humans. AAAI Workshop on AI Architectures.
- Amodei, D., et al. (2016. It Is Okay to Be Worried about AI Safety. arXiv: 1606.06565
- Chandola, V., Banerjee, A. and Kumar, V. (2009) Anomaly Detection. ACM Computing Surveys , 41, 1-58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882
- McMahan, H.B., et al. (2017) Getting Information from Deep Networks with Less Communication and Decentralized Data. AISTATS.
- Dwork, C. (2008) Differential Privacy: An Analysis of the Results. TAMC.
- Moreau, L., Clifford, B., Freire, J., Futrelle, J., Gil, Y., Groth, P., et al. (2011) The Open Provenance Model Core Specification (V1.1). Future Generation Computer Systems , 27, 743-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2010.07.005
- Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Celik, Z.B. and Swami, A. (2017). Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security , Abu Dhabi, 2-6 April 2017, 506-519. https://doi.org/10.1145/3052973.3053009
- Kaggle (2019) IEEE-CIS Fraud Detection. https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/ieee-fraud-detection
- Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O. and Kegelmeyer, W.P. (2002) SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 16, 321-357. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953
- Li, S.Z. and Jain, A. (2011) Handbook of Face Recognition, 2nd Edition, Springer.