Hybrid Methodology for Structural Health Monitoring Based on Immune Algorithms and Symbolic Time Series Analysis
- 1 Department of System Design Engineering, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.
- 2 Department of System Design Engineering, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.
- 3 Department of System Design Engineering, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.
Abstract
This hybrid methodology for structural health monitoring (SHM) is based on immune algorithms (IAs) and symbolic time series analysis (STSA). Real-valued negative selection (RNS) is used to detect damage detection and adaptive immune clonal selection algorithm (AICSA) is used to localize and quantify the damage. Data symbolization by using STSA alleviates the effects of harmful noise in raw acceleration data. This paper explains the mathematical basis of STSA and the procedure of the hybrid methodology. It also describes the results of an simulation experiment on a five-story shear frame structure that indicated the hybrid strategy can efficiently and precisely detect, localize and quan tify damage to civil engineering structures in the presence of measurement noise.
- R. I. Levin and N. A. J. Lieven, “Dynamic Finite Element Model Updating Using Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithms,” Mechanical System and Signal Process, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1998, pp. 91-120. doi:10.1006/mssp.1996.0136
- K. Cunha and V. V. Smith, “A Determination of the Solar Photospheric Boron Abundance,” Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 512, No. 2, 1999, pp. 1006-1013. doi:10.1086/306796
- S. T. Xue, H. S. Tang and J. Zhou, “Identification of Structural Systems Using Particle Swarm Optimization,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2009, pp. 517-524. doi:10.3130/jaabe.8.517
- R. Li and A. Mita, “Structural Damage Identification Using Adaptive Immune Clonal Selection Algorithm and Acceleration Data,” SPIE Smart Structures/NDE2011, San Diego, 6-10 March, 2011, 79815A.
- R. Li and A. Mita, “Hybrid Immune Algorithm for Structural Health Monitoring Using Acceleration Data,” 8th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, 13-15 September 2011, pp. 1095-1102.
- A. Ray, “Symbolic Dynamic Analysis of Complex Systems for Anomaly Detection,” Signal Processing, Vol. 84, No. 7, 2004, pp. 1115-1130. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2004.03.011
- S. Chin, A. Ray and V. Rajagopalan, “Symbolic Time Series Analysis for Anomaly Detection: A Comparative Evaluation,” Signal Processing, Vol. 85, No. 9, 2005, pp. 1859-1868. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.03.014
- A. Khatkhate, A. Ray, S. Chin, V. Rajagopalan and E. Keller, “Detection of Fatigue Crack Anomaly: A Symbolic Dynamic Approach,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, Boston, 30 June-2 July 2004; pp. 3741-3746.
- D. Tolani, M. Yasar, A. Ray and V. Yang, “Anomaly Detection in Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines,” AIAA Journal of Aerospace Computing Information, and Communication, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2006, pp. 44-51. doi:10.2514/1.15768
- S. Bhatnagar, V. Rajagopalan and A. Ray, “Incipient Fault Detection in Mechanical Power Transmission Systems,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, Portland, 8-10 June 2005, pp. 472-477.
- S. Forrest, A. Perelson, L. Allen and R. Cherukuri, “SelfNonself Discrimination in a Computer’,” Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, Los Alamitos, 16-18 May 1994, pp. 202-212.
- F. Gonzalez, D. Dasgupta and R. Kozma, “Combining Negative Selection and Classification Techniques for Anomaly Detection,” Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC2002, 12-17 May Honolulu, pp. 705-710.