Mitigating increasing cyberattack incidents may require strategies such as reinforcing organizations’ networks with Honeypots and effectively analyzing attack traffic for detection of zero-day attacks and vulnerabilities. To effectively detect and mitigate cyberattacks, both computerized and visual analyses are typically required. However, most security analysts are not adequately trained in visualization principles and/or methods, which is required for effective visual perception of useful attack information hidden in attack data. Additionally, Honeypot has proven useful in cyberattack research, but no studies have comprehensively investigated visualization practices in the field. In this paper, we reviewed visualization practices and methods commonly used in the discovery and communication of attack patterns based on Honeypot network traffic data. Using the PRISMA methodology, we identified and screene d 218 papers and evaluated only 37 papers having a high impact. Most Honeypot papers conducted summary statistics of Honeypot data based on stat ic data metrics such as IP address, port, and packet size. They visually analyzed Honeypot attack data using simple graphical methods (such as line, bar, and pie charts) that tend to hide useful attack information. Furthermore, only a few papers conducted extended attack analysis, and commonly visualized attack data using scatter and linear plots. Papers rarely included simple yet sophisticated graphical methods, such as box plots and histograms, which allow for critical evaluation of analysis results. While a significant number of automated visualization tools have incorporated visualization standards by default, the construction of effective and expressive graphical methods for easy pattern discovery and explainable insights still requires applied knowledge and skill of visualization principles and tools, and occasionally, an interdis ciplinary collaboration with peers. We, therefore, suggest the need, going forward, for non-classical graphical methods for visualizing attack patterns and communicating analysis results. We also recommend training investigators in visualization principles and standards for effective visual perception and presentation.
KeywordsHoneypot Data AnalysisNetwork Intrusion DetectionVisualization and Visual AnalysisGraphical Methods and PerceptionSystematic Literature Review
Card, S., Mackinlay, J. and Shneiderman, B. (1999) Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, 579-581.
Ltifi, H., Kolski, C. and ben Ayed, M. (2020) Survey on Visualization and Visual Analytics Pipeline-Based Models: Conceptual Aspects, Comparative Studies and Challenges. Computer Science Review, 36, Article ID: 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100245
Alonso, á., et al. (2010) Understanding Honeypot Data by an Unsupervised Neural Visualization. In: Herrero, á., Corchado, E., Redondo, C. and Alonso, á., Eds., Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems 2010, Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, Vol. 85, Springer, Berlin, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16626-6_17
Sokol, P., Kleinová, L. and Husák, M. (2015) Study of Attack Using Honeypots and Honeynets Lessons Learned from Time-Oriented Visualization. IEEE EUROCON—International Conference on Computer as a Tool (EUROCON), Salamanca, 8-11 September 2015, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROCON.2015.7313713
Krasser, S., Conti, G., Grizzard, J., Gribschaw, J. and Owen, H. (2005) Real-Time and Forensic Network Data Analysis Using Animated and Coordinated Visualization. Proceedings from the 6th Annual IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) Information Assurance Workshop, West Point, 15-17 June 2005, 42-49.
dos Santos, S. and Brodlie, K. (2004) Gaining Understanding of Multivariate and Multidimensional Data through Visualization. Computers & Graphics, 28, 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2004.03.013
Djap, R., Lim, C., Silaen, K.E. and Yusuf, A. (2021) XB-Pot: Revealing Honeypot-Based Attacker’s Behaviors. 2021 9th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), Yogyakarta, 3-5 August 2021, 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT52021.2021.9527422
Ghourabi, A., Abbes, T. and Bouhoula, A. (2013) Automatic Analysis of Web Service Honeypot Data Using Machine Learning Techniques. International Joint Conference CISIS’12-ICEUTE12-SOCO12 Special Sessions, Ostrava, 5-7 September 2012, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33018-6_1
Ikuomenisan, G. and Morgan, Y. (2022) Meta-Review of Recent and Landmark Honeypot Research and Surveys. Journal of Information Security, 13, 181-209.
Moreland, K. (2013) A Survey of Visualization Pipelines. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.133
Fernandes, G., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C., Carvalho, L.F., Al-Muhtadi, J.F. and Proença, M.L. (2019) A Comprehensive Survey on Network Anomaly Detection. Telecommunication Systems, 70, 447-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-018-0475-8
Sorzano, C.O.S., Vargas, J. and Montano, A.P. (2014) A Survey of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques.
Sacha, D., et al. (2017) Visual Interaction with Dimensionality Reduction: A Structured Literature Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23, 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598495
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G. and Group, T.P. (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6, e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Spitzner, L. (2002) Honeypots: Tracking Hackers. Addison-Wesley, Boston.
Silva, D. and Rodriguez, G. (2017) A Review of the Current State of Honeynet Architectures and Tools. International Journal of Security and Networks, 12, 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSN.2017.10009165
Zobal, L., Kolář, D. and Fujdiak, R. (2019) Current State of Honeypots and Deception Strategies in Cybersecurity. 2019 11th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT), Dublin, 28-30 October 2019, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUMT48472.2019.8970921
Fan, W., Du, Z., Fernández, D. and Villagrá, V.A. (2018) Enabling an Anatomic View to Investigate Honeypot Systems: A Survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 12, 3906-3919. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2017.2762161
Nawrocki, M., Wählisch, M., Schmidt, T.C., Keil, C. and Schönfelder, J. (2016) A Survey on Honeypot Software and Data Analysis. Cornell University Library, Ithaca.
Kemppainen, S. and Kovanen, T. (2018) Honeypot Utilization for Network Intrusion Detection. In: Lehto, M. and Neittaanmäki, P., Eds., Cyber Security: Power and Technology, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75307-2_15
Visoottiviseth, V., Jaralrungroj, U., Phoomrungraungsuk, E. and Kultanon (2011) Distributed Honeypot Log Management and Visualization of Attacker Geographical Distribution. 2011 Eighth International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), Nakhon Pathom, 11-13 May 2011, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCSSE.2011.5930083
Wikipedia Contributors (2022) Data and Information Visualization—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Data_and_information_visualization&oldid=1097071271
Biffi, G., Tannahill, D., McCafferty, J. and Balasubramanian, S. (2013) Quantitative Visualization of DNA G-Quadruplex Structures in Human Cells. Nature Chemistry, 5, 182-186. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1548
Kirchner, K., Zec, J. and Delibašić, B. (2016) Facilitating Data Preprocessing by a Generic Framework: A Proposal for Clustering. Artificial Intelligence Review, 45, 271-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9446-6
Chi, E.H. (2000) A Taxonomy of Visualization Techniques Using the Data State Reference Model. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings, Salt Lake City, 9-10 October 2000, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2000.885092
Haber, R.B. and McNabb, D.A. (1990) Visualization Idioms: A Conceptual Model for Scientific Visualization Systems. In: Visualization in Scientific Computing, IEEE Computer Society Press, London, 74-93.
Keim, D., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J.-D., Görg, C., Kohlhammer, J. and Melançon, G. (2008) Visual Analytics: Definition, Process, and Challenges. In: Kerren, A., Stasko, J.T., Fekete, J.-D. and North, C., Eds., Information Visualization, Springer, Berlin, 154-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70956-5_7
Ltifi, H., Ben Mohamed, E. and ben Ayed, M. (2016) Interactive Visual Knowledge Discovery from Data-Based Temporal Decision Support System. Information Visualization, 15, 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871614567794
Sacha, D., Stoffel, A., Stoffel, F., Kwon, B.C., Ellis, G. and Keim, D.A. (2014) Knowledge Generation Model for Visual Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20, 1604-1613. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346481
Alonso, á., et al. (2010) On the Visualization of Honeypot Data through Projection Techniques. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational and Mathematical Methods in Science and Engineering, CMMSE2010 Almeria, Almeria, 27-30 June 2010, 1-12.
O’donoghue, S.I., et al. (2018) Visualization of Biomedical Data. Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science, 1, 275-304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013424
Cleveland, W.S. and McGill, R. (1984) Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 531-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080
Wikipedia Contributors (2021) Line Chart—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_chart
Wikipedia Contributors (2021) Pie Chart—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pie_chart
Wikipedia Contributors (2021) Bar Chart—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_chart
Weissgerber, T.L., Milic, N.M., Winham, S.J. and Garovic, V.D. (2015) Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002128
Wikipedia Contributors (2021) Scatter Plot—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scatter_plot
Wikipedia Contributors (2021) Box Plot—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_plot
Wikipedia Contributors (20221) Histogram—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histogram
Wikipedia Contributors (2021) Heat Map—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_map
Bringer, M.L., Chelmecki, C.A. and Fujinoki, H. (2012) A Survey: Recent Advances and Future Trends in Honeypot Research. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 4, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2012.10.07
McGrew, R. (2006) Experiences with Honeypot Systems: Development, Deployment, and Analysis. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06), Kauai, 4-7 January 2006, 220a. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.172
Fernandez, R. and Fetais, N. (2017) Survey of Information Visualization Techniques for Enhancing Visual Analysis. 2017 International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA), Doha, 6-7 September 2017, 360-363. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMAPP.2017.8079755
Yang, L., Ma, Z., Zhu, L. and Liu, L. (2019) Research on the Visualization of Spatio-Temporal Data. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 234, Article ID: 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/234/1/012013
Shen, H., et al. (2019) Information Visualisation Methods and Techniques: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 16, Article ID: 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2019.07.003
Zhang, T., Wang, X., Li, Z., Guo, F., Ma, Y. and Chen, W. (2017) A Survey of Network Anomaly Visualization. Science China. Information Sciences, 60, 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-0428-2
Yang, J., et al. (2021) Visual Anomaly Detection for Images: A Survey.
Soo-Yeon, J., Bong-Keun, J. and Jeong, D.H. (2021) Evaluating Visualization Approaches to Detect Abnormal Activities in Network Traffic Data. International Journal of Information Security, 20, 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-020-00504-9
Schölkopf, B., Platt, J.C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Smola, A.J. and Williamson, R.C. (2001) Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution. Neural Computation, 13, 1443-1471. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976601750264965
Daassi, C., Nigay, L. and Fauvet, M.-C. (2004) Visualization Process of Temporal Data. in Database and Expert Systems Applications, Zaragoza, 30 August-3 September 2004, 914-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30075-5_88
Heer, J. and Agrawala, M. (2006) Software Design Patterns for Information Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 853-860. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.178
Munzner, T. (2009) A Nested Model for Visualization Design and Validation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15, 921-928. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.111
Endert, A., Fiaux, and North, C. (2012) Semantic Interaction for Sensemaking: Inferring Analytical Reasoning for Model Steering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18, 2879-2888. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.260
Falih Badran, M., Sahar, N.M., Sari, S. and Taujuddin, N.S.A.M. (2020) Intrusion-Detection System Based on Hybrid Models: Review Paper. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 917, Article ID: 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/917/1/012059
Howard, W.R. (2007) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning20072Christopher M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer 2006. i-xx, 740 pp., ISBN: 0-387-31073-8 $74.95 Hardcover. Kybernetes, 36, 275-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920710743466
Ning, X., et al. (2020) Nonparametric Topic Modeling with Neural Inference. Neurocomputing (Amsterdam), 399, 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.128
Bergmann, P., Batzner, K., Fauser, M., Sattlegger, D. and Steger, C. (2021) The MVTec Anomaly Detection Dataset: A Comprehensive Real-World Dataset for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 129, 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-020-01400-4
Carrera, D., Manganini, F., Boracchi, G. and Lanzarone, E. (2017) Defect Detection in SEM Images of Nanofibrous Materials. The IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13, 551-561. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2016.2641472
Napoletano, P., Piccoli, F. and Schettini, R. (2018) Anomaly Detection in Nanofibrous Materials by CNN-Based Self-Similarity. Sensors (Basel), 18, Article 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010209
Carrera, D., Boracchi, G., Foi, A. and Wohlberg, B. (2016) Scale-Invariant Anomaly Detection with Multiscale Group-Sparse Models. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Phoenix, 25-28 September 2016, 3892-3896. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533089
Xie, X.H. and Mirmehdi, M. (2007) TEXEMS: Texture Exemplars for Defect Detection on Random Textured Surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29, 1454-1464. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1038
Akoglu, L., Tong, H. and Koutra, D. (2015) Graph Based Anomaly Detection and Description: A Survey. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 29, 626-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-014-0365-y
Wagner, C., Wagener, G., State, R., Dulaunoy, A. and Engel, T. (2010) PeekKernelFlows: Peeking into IP Flows. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security, Ottawa, 14 September 2010, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1145/1850795.1850801
Wagner, C., Wagener, G., State, R. and Engel, T. (2011) Digging into IP Flow Records with a Visual Kernel Method. In: Herrero, á. and Corchado, E., Eds., Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems, Springer, Berlin, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21323-6_6
Page, M.J., et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, Article No. 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Wittmann, F.M. (2021) Sort Google Scholar by the Number of Citations V2.0b. https://github.com/WittmannF/sort-google-scholar
SpringerLink, Springer Nature Switzerland AG (2021). http://link.springer.com
IEEE Xplore, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2021). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org
ACM Digital Library, Association for Computing Machinery (2021). https://dl.acm.org
Chuvakin, A. (2003) “Honeynets: High Value Security Data”: Analysis of Real Attacks Launched at a Honeypot. Network Security, 2003, 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(03)00808-0
Baykara, M. and Das, R. (2018) A Novel Honeypot Based Security Approach for Real-Time Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 41, 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2018.06.004
Vasilomanolakis, E., Karuppayah, S., Kikiras and Mühlhäuser, M. (2015) A Honeypot-Driven Cyber Incident Monitor: Lessons Learned and Steps Ahead. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks, Sochi, 8-10 September 2015, 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799979.2799999
Kobayashi, H., Zhang, Z., Ochiai, H. and Esaki, H. (2019) Probing Firewalls of Malware-Infected Networks with Honeypot. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Future Internet Technologies, Phuket, 7-9 August 2019, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341188.3341190
Belqruch, A. and Maach, A. (2019) SCADA Security Using SSH Honeypot. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security, Rabat, 27-29 March 2019, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3320326.3320328
Song, J., Takakura, H., Okabe, Y., Eto, M., Inoue, D. and Nakao, K. (2011) Statistical Analysis of Honeypot Data and Building of Kyoto 2006+ Dataset for NIDS Evaluation. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Building Analysis Datasets and Gathering Experience Returns for Security, Salzburg, 10 April 2011, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978672.1978676
Singh, A.N. and Joshi, R.C. (2011) A Honeypot System for Efficient Capture and Analysis of Network Attack Traffic. 2011 International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Computing and Networking Technologies, Kumaracoil, 21-22 July 2011, 514-519. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCCN.2011.6024606
More, A. and Tapaswi, S. (2013) A Software Router Based Predictive Honeypot Roaming Scheme for Network Security and Attack Analysis. 2013 9th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT), Abu Dhabi, 17-19 March 2013, 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1109/Innovations.2013.6544422
Almotairi, S., Clark, A., Mohay, G. and Zimmermann, J. (2009) A Technique for Detecting New Attacks in Low-Interaction Honeypot Traffic. 2009 4th International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection, Venice/Mestre, 24-28 May 2009, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMP.2009.9
Koniaris, I., Papadimitriou, G. and Nicopolitidis (2013) Analysis and Visualization of SSH Attacks Using Honeypots. IEEE Eurocon 2013, Zagreb, 1-4 July 2013, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROCON.2013.6624967
Almotairi, S., Clark, A., Mohay, G. and Zimmermann, J. (2008) Characterization of Attackers’ Activities in Honeypot Traffic Using Principal Component Analysis. 2008 IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing, Paris, 3-5 November 2021, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1109/NPC.2008.82
Chen,T., Laih, C.S., Pouget, F. and Dacier, M. (2005) Comparative Survey of Local Honeypot Sensors to Assist Network Forensics. 1st International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE’05), Taipei, 7-9 November 2005, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2005.6
Kyriakou, A. and Sklavos, N. (2018) Container-Based Honeypot Deployment for the Analysis of Malicious Activity. 2018 Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS), Thessaloniki, 23-25 October 2018, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/GIIS.2018.8635778
Fraunholz, D., Zimmermann, M., Hafner, A. and Schotten, H.D. (2017) Data Mining in Long-Term Honeypot Data. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), New Orleans, 18-21 November 2017, 649-656. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2017.92
Yeh, C.-H. and Yang, C.-H. (2008) Design and Implementation of Honeypot Systems Based on Open-Source Software. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, Taipei, 17-20 June 2008, 265-266.
Fraunholz, D., Zimmermann, M., Anton, S.D., Schneider, J. and Dieter Schotten, H. (2017) Distributed and Highly-Scalable WAN Network Attack Sensing and Sophisticated Analysing Framework Based on Honeypot Technology. 2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science Engineering—Confluence, Noida, 12-13 January 2017, 416-421. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943186
Pomsathit, A. (2012) Effective of Unicast and Multicast IP Address Attack over Intrusion Detection System with Honeypot. 2012 Spring Congress on Engineering and Technology, Xi’an, 27-30 May 2012, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCET.2012.6342030
Lihet, M. and Dadarlat, V. (2018) Honeypot in the Cloud Five Years of Data Analysis. 2018 17th RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet), Cluj-Napoca, 6-8 September 2018, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROEDUNET.2018.8514128
Koniaris, I., Papadimitriou, G., Nicopolitidis and Obaidat, M. (2014) Honeypots Deployment for the Analysis and Visualization of Malware Activity and Malicious Connections. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Sydney, 10-14 June 2014, 1819-1824. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2014.6883587
Wang, B., Dou, Y., Sang, Y., Zhang, Y. and Huang, J. (2020) IoTCMal: Towards A Hybrid IoT Honeypot for Capturing and Analyzing Malware. ICC 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Dublin, 7-11 June 2020, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC40277.2020.9149314
Sethia, V. and Jeyasekar, A. (2019) Malware Capturing and Analysis Using Dionaea Honeypot. 2019 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, Chennai, 1-3 October 2019, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2019.8888409
Shyla, S. and Bhatnagar, V. (2021) The Geo-Spatial Distribution of Targeted Attacks sources Using Honeypot Networks. 2021 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science Engineering (Confluence), Noida, 28-29 January 2021, 600-604. https://doi.org/10.1109/Confluence51648.2021.9377145
Dowling, S., Schukat, M. and Melvin, H. (2017) Using Analysis of Temporal Variances within a Honeypot Dataset to Better Predict Attack Type Probability. 2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST), Cambridge, 11-14 December 2017, 349-354. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356416
Lakh, Y. and Shymkiv, R. (2019) Using Honeypot Programs for Providing Defense of Banking Network Infrastructure. 2019 IEEE International Scientific-Practical Conference Problems of Infocommunications, Science and Technology (PIC S T), Kyiv, 8-11 October 2019, 527-532. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICST47496.2019.9061550
Moore, C. and Al-Nemrat, A. (2015) An Analysis of Honeypot Programs and the Attack Data Collected. In: Jahankhani, H., Carlile, A., Akhgar, B., Taal, A., Hessami, A.G. and Hosseinian-Far, A., Eds., Global Security, Safety and Sustainability: Tomorrow’s Challenges of Cyber Security, Springer, Berlin, 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23276-8_20
Sánchez, R., Herrero, á. and Corchado, E. (2015) Clustering and Neural Visualization for Flow-Based Intrusion Detection. Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems Conference, Burgos, 15-17 June 2015, 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19713-5_29
Cao, J., Li, W., Li, J. and Li, B. (2018) DiPot: A Distributed Industrial Honeypot System. In: Qiu, M.K., Ed., Smart Computing and Communication, Springer, Berlin, 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73830-7_30
Abbas, C.J.B., Villalba, L.J.G. and López, V.L. (2007) Implementation and Attacks Analysis of a Honeypot. In: Gervasi, O. and Gavrilova, M.L., Eds., Computational Science and Its Applications, Springer, Berlin, 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74477-1_46
Nicomette, V., Kaaniche, M., Alata, E. and Herrb, M. (2011) Set-Up and Deployment of a High-Interaction Honeypot: Experiment and Lessons Learned. Journal in Computer Virology, 7, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-010-0144-2
Agrawal, N. and Tapaswi, S. (2017) The Performance Analysis of Honeypot Based Intrusion Detection System for Wireless Network. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 24, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-016-0330-3
Zurutuza, U., Ezpeleta, E., Herrero, á. and Corchado, E. (2011) Visualization of Misuse-Based Intrusion Detection: Application to Honeynet Data. In: Corchado, E., et al., Eds., Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications, 6th International Conference SOCO 2011, Springer, Berlin, 561-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19644-7_59
Dumas, M., Robert, J.-M. and Mcguffin, M.J. (2012) Alertwheel: Radial Bipartite Graph Visualization Applied to Intrusion Detection System Alerts. IEEE Network, 26, 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2012.6375888
Leaden, G., Zimmermann, M., DeCusatis, C. and Labouseur, A.G. (2017) An API Honeypot for DDoS and XSS Analysis. 2017 IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conference (URTC), Cambridge, 3-5 November 2017, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/URTC.2017.8284180
Aupetit, M., Zhauniarovich, Y., Vasiliadis, G., Dacier, M. and Boshmaf, Y. (2016) Visualization of Actionable Knowledge to Mitigate DRDoS Attacks. 2016 IEEE Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security (VizSec), Baltimore, 24 October 2016, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIZSEC.2016.7739577