On the Use of Benford’s Law to Detect JPEG Biometric Data Tampering
- 1 Department of Mathematics/Computer Science, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria
- 2 Department of Computer Science, Nigerian Army Institute of Technology & Environmental Studies, Makurdi, Nigeria
Abstract
Tampering of biometric data has attracted a great deal of attention recently. Furthermore, there could be an intentional or accidental use of a particular biometric sample instead of another for a particular application. Therefore, there exists a need to propose a method to detect data tampering, as well as differentiate biometric samples in cases of intentional or accidental use for a different application. In this paper, fingerprint image tampering is studied. Furthermore, optically acquired fingerprints, synthetically generated fingerprints and contact-less acquired fingerprints are studied for separation purposes using the Benford’s law divergence metric. Benford’s law has shown in literature to be very effective in detecting tampering of natural images. In this paper, the Benford’s law features with support vector machine are proposed for the detection of malicious tampering of JPEG fingerprint images. This method is aimed at protecting against insider attackers and hackers. This proposed method detected tampering effectively, with Equal Error Rate (EER) of 2.08%. Again, the experimental results illustrate that, optically acquired fingerprints, synthetically generated fingerprints and contact-less acquired fingerprints can be separated by the proposed method effectively.
- Hsiao, D.-Y. and Pei, S.-C. (2005) Detecting Digital Tampering by Blur Estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE First International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE05), 264-278. https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2005.8
- Farid, H. (2009) A Survey of Image Forgery Detection. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 26, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2008.931079
- Li, X.H., Zhao, Y., Liao, M., Shih, F.Y. and Shi, Y.Q. (2012) Detection of Tampered Region for JPEG Images by Using Mode-Based First Digit Features. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 190, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-6180-2012-190
- Meuwly, D. and Veldhuis, R. (2012) Forensic Biometrics: From Two Communities to One Discipline, 2012 BIOSIG-Proceedings of the International Conference of Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG), 13029856.
- Iorliam, A., Ho, A.T.S., Poh, N. and Shi, Y.Q. (2014) Do Biometric Images Follow the Benford’s Law? 2nd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWBF.2014.6914261
- Roberts, C.M. (2007) Biometric Attack Vectors and Defences. Computers and Security, 26, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2006.12.008
- Lazarick, R. (2012) Presentation Attack Detection. Department of Biometrics, Com-put. Sci. Corp., Tech. Rep.
- Dong, J., Wang, W. and Tan, T. (2013) Casia Image Tampering Detection Evaluation Database. IEEE ChinaSIP, 422-426.
- Ratha, N., Connell, J.H. and Bolle, R.M. (2001) An Analysis of Minutiae Matching Strength. Proc. Audio and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication (AVBPA), 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45344-X_32
- FastCompany (2011) The Dark Side of Biometrics: 9 Million Israelis Hacked Info Hits the Web. http://www.fastcompany.com/1790444/dark-side-biometrics-9-million-israelis-hacked-info-hits-web
- Hildebrandt, M., Sturm, J., Dittmann, J. and Vielhauer, C. (2013) Creation of a Public Corpus of Contact-Less Acquired Latent Fingerprints without Privacy Implications. In: IFIP International Conference on Communications and Multimedia Security, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 204-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40779-6_19
- Maltoni, D., Maio, D., Jain, A.K. and Prabhakar, S. (2003) Synthetic Fingerprint Generation. Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition, 271-302.
- Benford, F. (1938) The Law of Anomalous Numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 551-572.