Risk Exchange under EUUP
- 1 Faculty of Business Administration, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan
Abstract
In this paper, we consider an equilibrium insurance premium and risk exchange in a pure exchange economy with ambiguity or Knightian uncertainty. Each agent’s preference is represented by the expected utility with uncertainty probability (EUUP) theory. The Bühlmann’s economic premium principle is generalized under EUUP. Contrary to the existing models, our principle under uncertainty is given unanimously and can be calculated more easily and explicitly. Through comparative statics, we show that insurance transactions occur and demand for insurance is not always comonotonic due to the difference in the degree of ambiguity aversion even if all of the agents in the economy are ambiguity averse or ambiguity loving.
- Borch, K. (1962) Equilibrium in a Reinsurance Market. Econometrica, 30, 424-444. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909887
- Bühlmann, H. (1980) An Economic Premium Principle. Astin Bulletin, 11, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0515036100006619
- Bühlmann, H. (1984) The General Economic Premium Principle. Astin Bulletin, 14, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0515036100004773
- Ellsberg, D. (1961) Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324
- Tsanakas, A. and Christofides, N. (2006) Risk Exchange with Distorted Probabilities. Astin Bulletin, 36, 219-243. https://doi.org/10.2143/AST.36.1.2014150
- Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D. (1989) Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9
- Schmeidler, D. (1989) Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity. Econometrica, 57, 571-587. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911053
- Quiggin, J. (1982) A Theory of Anticipated Utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7
- Fujii, Y., Iwaki, H. and Osaki, Y. (2017) An Economic Premium Principle under the Dual Theory of the Smooth Ambiguity Model. Astin Bulletin, 47, 787-801. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2017.14
- Iwaki, H. and Osaki, Y. (2014) The Dual Theory of the Smooth Ambiguity Model. Economic Theory, 56, 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-013-0779-6
- Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M. and Mukerji, S. (2005) A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity. Econometrica, 73, 1849-1892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00640.x
- Izhakian, Y. (2017) Expected Utility with Uncertain Probability Theory. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 69, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.12.004
- Chatauneuf, A., Dana, R.A. and Tallon, J.M. (2000) Optimal Risk-Sharing Rules and Equilibria with Choquet-Expected Utility. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 34, 191-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4068(00)00041-0
- Xu, Z.Q., Zhou, X.Y. and Zhuang, S.C. (2019) Optimal Insurance under Rank-Dependent Utility and Incentive Compatibility. Mathematical Finance, 29, 659-692. https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12185
- Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992) Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574