Sparsity and Its Impact on Financial Network with Complete Core-Periphery Structure
- 1 Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- 2 Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Abstract
This paper theoretically investigates network sparsity and its impact. We focus on a specific topology of the network, i.e. , the network with core-periphery structures, which is a widely studied financial network structure. It is crucial to understand how changes in sparsity influence network impact. For example, reducing the sparsity of a banking network can offer significant advantages. Upgrading strategically a local bank branch to a regional headquarters improves the connectedness among regional branches. Similarly, reducing the overall sparsity of a banking network by strategically merging two financial networks into one can create substantial potential impacts on banking operations. We derive closed-form solutions that quantify links between sparsity and its impact on financial networks with complete core-periphery structures. We prove that reducing sparsity increases impacts on networks with complete core-periphery components through two sparsity reduction strategies. We further validate other impact measures through simulations.
- Allen, F. and Gale, D. (2000) Financial Contagion. Journal of Political Economy , 108, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1086/262109
- Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015) Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks. American Economic Review , 105, 564-608. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130456
- Glasserman, P. and Young, H.P. (2016) Contagion in Financial Networks. Journal of Economic Literature , 54, 779-831. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151228
- Jie, E.Y. and Ma, Y. (2025) An Analysis of Incomplete and Random Financial Networks. Journal of Mathematical Finance , in Press.
- Di Maggio, M., Kermani, A. and Song, Z. (2017) The Value of Trading Relations in Turbulent Times. Journal of Financial Economics , 124, 266-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.01.003
- Li, D. and Schürhoff, N. (2018) Dealer Networks. The Journal of Finance , 74, 91-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12728
- Levine, R., Lin, C. and Wang, Z. (2020) Bank Networks and Acquisitions. Management Science , 66, 5216-5241. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3428
- Jackson, M. (2008) Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833993
- LeSage, J.P. and Pace, R.K. (2009) Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420064254
- Diestel, R. (2005) Graph Theory. 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag.
- Bech, M.L. and Atalay, E. (2010) The Topology of the Federal Funds Market. Physica A : Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications , 389, 5223-5246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.05.058
- Hollifield, B., Neklyudov, A. and Spatt, C. (2017) Bid-Ask Spreads, Trading Networks, and the Pricing of Securitizations. The Review of Financial Studies , 30, 3048-3085. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx027
- Craig, B. and Ma, Y. (2022) Intermediation in the Interbank Lending Market. Journal of Financial Economics , 145, 179-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.11.003
- Elliott, M., Golub, B. and Jackson, M.O. (2014) Financial Networks and Contagion. American Economic Review , 104, 3115-3153. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3115
- Cerdeiro, D.A., Dziubiński, M. and Goyal, S. (2017) Individual Security, Contagion, and Network Design. Journal of Economic Theory , 170, 182-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2017.05.006