A Systems-Based Balanced Cost-Benefit Analysis of Corporate-Community Engagement in Resource Extraction: The CoSLIE Framework — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A Systems-Based Balanced Cost-Benefit Analysis of Corporate-Community Engagement in Resource Extraction: The CoSLIE Framework
Department of Accounting and Finance, Ho Technical University, Ho, Ghana
1 Department of Accounting and Finance, Ho Technical University, Ho, Ghana
This study develops and empirically calibrates the Community-Social Licence-Insurance Equilibrium (CoSLIE) Model, a dynamic, multi-theoretic framework that reconceptualises corporate-community engagement in resource-dependent economies through a systems-based lens. Synthesising stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and resource dependence theory, the model transcends static paradigms by embedding recursive feedback loops among Community Engagement (CE), Balanced Cost-Benefit perceptions (BCB), Social Licence to Operate (SLO), and Social Insurance (SI), with Local Governance Quality (LGQ) as an institutional moderator. Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), Bayesian inference, Panel Vector Autoregression (PVAR), machine learning algorithms (GBM, SVR), and Lyapunov-based chaos diagnostics, the model is validated using primary data from 420 respondents across Ghana, South Africa, and Tanzania. The results reveal robust direct and mediated effects of CE on both SLO and SI, moderated significantly by LGQ. The dynamic simulations confirm bounded legitimacy growth trajectories, with high governance environments yielding rapid SLO convergence, while low-LGQ contexts exhibit chaotic volatility. Monte Carlo simulations indicate consistently positive Net Present Values (NPVs), underscoring the financial resilience of structured engagement strategies. Social Network Analysis further highlights the community as the central node in legitimacy diffusion. The CoSLIE Model thus offers a mathematically rigorous, empirically validated, and ethically reflexive decision-support tool, equipping firms, regulators, and communities to optimise stakeholder investments under uncertainty. By translating intangible legitimacy constructs into quantifiable economic indicators, CoSLIE advances a new frontier in ESG-aligned stakeholder governance and policy-responsive social sustainability analytics.
KeywordsBalanced Cost-Benefit AnalysisCalibrationCommunity EngagementCoSLIE ModelCSRESGNatural ResourcesOperational Social Licence
Poncian, J. and Jose, G. (2019) Managing Stakeholder Conflicts in Extractive Industries. Extractive Industries and Society , 6, 701-713.
Hilson, G. and Maconachie, R. (2008) “Good Governance” and the Extractive Industries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review , 30, 52-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827500802045511
Bice, S. (2014) What Gives You a Social Licence? An Exploration of the Social Licence to Operate in the Australian Mining Industry. Resources , 3, 62-80. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3010062
Muhirwa, F., Shen, L., Elshkaki, A., Hirwa, H., Umuziranenge, G. and Velempini, K. (2023) Linking Large Extractive Industries to Sustainable Development of Rural Communities at Mining Sites in Africa: Challenges and Pathways. Resources Policy , 81, Article 103322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103322
Prno, J. and Slocombe, D.S. (2012) Exploring the Origins of ‘Social License to Operate’ in the Mining Sector: Perspectives from Governance and Sustainability Theories. Resources Policy , 37, 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002
Zhang, A., Yang, H. and Joyce, S. (2015) Quantifying Stakeholder Engagement Impacts in Resource Industries. Resources Policy , 44, 54-65.
Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Suchman, M.C. (1995) Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review , 20, 571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978) The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2022) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). 3rd Edition, Sage Publications.
Hall, N., Lacey, J., Carr-Cornish, S. and Dowd, A.M. (2015) Social Licence to Operate: Understanding How a Concept Has Been Translated into Practice in Energy Industries. Journal of Cleaner Production , 86, 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.020
Ansu-Mensah, P., Marfo, E.O., Awuah, L.S. and Amoako, K.O. (2021) Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Engagement in Ghana’s Mining Sector: A Case Study of Newmont Ahafo Mines. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility , 6, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-020-00054-2
Simulation
Social Insurance
Boutilier, R.G. (2017) A Measure of the Social License to Operate for Infrastructure and Extractive Projects. SSRN Electronic Journal . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3204005
Owen, J.R. and Kemp, D. (2013) Social Licence and Mining: A Critical Perspective. Resources Policy , 38, 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016
Franks, D.M. and Cohen, T. (2012) Social Licence in Design: Constructive Technology Assessment within a Mineral Research and Development Institution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 79, 1229-1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.03.001
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997) Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review , 22, 853-886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
Tilling, M.V. (2004) Some Thoughts on Legitimacy Theory in Social and Environmental Accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal , 24, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2004.9651716
Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2012) The institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford University Press.
Scott, J.C. (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
Hulland, J. (1999) Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies. Strategic Management Journal , 20, 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::aid-smj13>3.0.co;2-7
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research , 18, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Henseler, J., Hubona, G. and Ray, P.A. (2016) Using PLS Path Modeling in New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems , 116, 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies , 58, 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. and Rosen, H.S. (1988) Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica , 56, 1371-1395. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913103
Love, I. and Zicchino, L. (2006) Financial Development and Dynamic Investment Behavior: Evidence from Panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance , 46, 190-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007
Engle, R. (2002) Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , 20, 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487
Muthén, B. and Asparouhov, T. (2012) Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling: A More Flexible Representation of Substantive Theory. Psychological Methods , 17, 313-335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802
Wolf, A., Swift, J.B., Swinney, H.L. and Vastano, J.A. (1985) Determining Lyapunov Exponents from a Time Series. Physica D : Nonlinear Phenomena , 16, 285-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(85)90011-9
Simon, H.A. (1990) Bounded Rationality. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P., Eds., Utility and Probability , Palgrave Macmillan, 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_5