Valuation and Financing of Cash Cows and Growth Firms
- 1 School of Management, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA
- 2 College of Business, University of Arkansas at Fort Smith, Fort Smith, USA
Abstract
This paper develops separate trade-off models for the valuation and financing of non-growth firms (cash cows) and growth firms that incorporate tax benefits, bankruptcy costs, and relevant agency costs. Cash cows generally have rela tively high leverage, though firm value, leverage, and profitability are all affected by variations in the efficacy of both internal and external governance mechanisms to mitigate agency costs of managerial discretion. For growth firms, where agency costs of debt are relevant, we find that: 1 ) optimal leverage is generally relatively low; 2 ) the relationship between optimal leverage and Tobin’s Q is negative and highly convex; and 3 ) optimal leverage increases with initial profitability. Our analysis helps to explain anomalous results documented in previous empirical tests of trade-off theory, specifically, relationships between leverage and both the market-to-book assets ratio and profitability.
- F. Modigliani and M. Miller, “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment,” American Economic Review, Vol. 48, 1958, pp. 267-297.
- A. Kraus and R. Litzenberger, “A State-Preference Model of Optimal Financial Leverage,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1973, pp. 911-922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01415.x
- E. F. Fama and K. R. French, “Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.1.1
- M. Z. Frank and V. K. Goyal, “Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors Are Reliably Important?” Financial Management, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x
- J. P. Ogden and S. Wu, “Reassessing the Effect of Growth Options on Leverage,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 23, 2013, pp. 182-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.08.008
- J. Tobin, “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory,” Journal of Money, Credit, & Banking, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1969, pp. 15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1991374
- M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1976, pp. 305-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
- M. C. Jensen, “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers,” American Economic Review, Vol. 76, 1986, pp. 323-329.
- R. Stulz, “Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1990, pp. 3-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90011-N
- S. F. Grossman and O. Hart, “Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives,” In: J. J. McCall, Ed., The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982.
- J. Williams, “Perquisites, Risk, and Capital Structure,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1987, pp. 29-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb02548.x
- J. Zwiebel, “Dynamic Capital Structure under Managerial Entrenchment,” American Economic Review, Vol. 86, 1996, pp. 1197-1215.
- S. C. Myers, “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1977, 1977, pp. 147-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0