Pricing Asian Options: A Comparison of Numerical and Simulation Approaches Twenty Years Later
- 1 Department of Finance, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 2 Department of Mathematics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
Abstract
Abstract The calculation of the Asian option value has posed a great challenge to financial mathematicians as well as practitioners for the last two decades. Since there exists no analytical valuation formula to date, one has to resort to other methods to price this commonly used derivative product. One possibility is the usage of simulation approaches, which however are especially inefficient for Asian options, due to their dependence on the entire stock price trajectory. Another alternative is resorting to semi-analytical methods, based on the inversion of the option price’s Laplace transform, which however are prone to severe numerical difficulties. In this paper, we seek answer to the question whether it is possible to improve on the efficiency of the semi-analytical approach, implementing and comparing different numerical algorithms, so that they could be applied in real-life situations. We look into whether today’s superior computer environment has changed the relative strength of numerical and simulation approaches with regards to Asian option pricing. Based on a comprehensive analysis of speed and reliability, we find that the Laplace transform inversion method can be further enhanced, pushing down the prior critical value from 0.01 to 0.005 and the calculation time from 20 - 30 seconds to 3 - 4 seconds. This renders the numerical approach readily applicable for practitioners; however, we conclude that the simulation approach is a more efficient option when σ 2 <0.01.
- Bodnar, G.M., Hayt, G.S. and Marston, R.C. (1998) Wharton Survey of Financial Risk Management by U.S. Non-Financial Firms. Financial Management, 27, 70-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.21314/JCF.1998.024
- Turnbull, S.M., McLean, S. and Wakeman, L.M. (1991) A Quick Algorithm for Pricing European Average Options. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26, 377-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.21314/JCF.1998.024
- Geman, H. and Yor, M. (1993) Asian Options, Bessel Processes and Perpetuities. Mathematical Finance, 3, 349-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.21314/JCF.1998.024
- Geman, H. and Eydeland, A. (1995) Domino Effect: Inverting the Laplace Transform. Risk, 8, 65-67.
- Fu, M.C., Madan, D.B. and Wang, T. (1999) Pricing Continuous Asian Options: A Comparison of Monte Carlo and Laplace Transform Inversion Methods. Journal of Computational Finance, 2, 49-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.21314/JCF.1998.024
- Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260062
- Kalos, M.H. and Whitlock, P.A. (2008) Monte Carlo Methods. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9783527626212
- Kleijnen, J.P.C., Ridder, A.A.N. and Rubinstein, R.Y. (2010) Variance Reduction Techniques in Monte Carlo Methods. CentER Discussion Paper Series, No. 2010-117.
- Kemna, A.G.Z. and Vorst, A.C.F. (1990) A Pricing Method for Options Based on Average Asset Values. Journal of Banking & Finance, 14, 113-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9783527626212
- Mitchell, R.L. (1968) Permanence of the Log-Normal Distribution. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 58, 1267-1272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.58.001267
- Carr, P. and Schroder, M. (2004) Bessel Processes, the Integral of Geometric Brownian Motion, and Asian Options. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 48, 400-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0040585X97980543
- Dufresne, D. (2004) Bessel Processes and a Functional of Brownian Motion. Center for Actuarial Studies, Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, Parkville. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/34342
- Cohen, A.M. (2007) Numerical Methods for Laplace Transform Inversion. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.
- Abate, J. and Whitt, W. (2006) A Unified Framework for Numerically Inverting Laplace Transforms. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 18, 408-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1050.0137