Strategic Market Making and Risk Sharing
- 1 Toulouse Business School, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
- 2 Toulouse Business School, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
- 3 Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, Maynooth University, County Kildare, Ireland
Abstract
We analyze the result of allowing a risk averse trader to split his order among risk averse market makers. We find that the market makers’ aggregate expected utility of profit can increase with the number of market markers and that the aggregate liquidity always increases with it. Despite this latter finding, we show that the cost of trading for the traders increases with the number of market makers as measured by their aggregate expected utility of profit. The larger the market makers’ risk aversion, the bigger that cost is. We also find that when the number of market makers tends to infinity, their aggregate expected utility of profit tends to zero. We also obtain that the market makers’ individual and aggregate expected utility of profit can increase with their risk aversion and that the trader’s expected utility of profit can increase or decrease with the market makers’ risk aversion. We offer a potential answer to the ongoing debate concerning the dealers’ competitiveness. Indeed, risk aversion reduces competition between market makers as it acts as a commitment for market makers to set higher prices. This commitment is higher the higher the risk aversion.
- Lyons, R. (2001) The Microstructure Approach to Exchange Rates. MIT Press, Cambridge.
- Kyle, A. (1985) Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading. Econometrica, 53, 1315-1335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913210
- Kyle, A. (1984) Market Structure, Information, Futures Markets and Price Formation. In: Storey, G.G., Schmitz, A. and Sarris, A.H., Eds., International Agricultural Trade: Advanced Readings in Price Formation, Market Structure, and Price Instabilit, Westview Press, Boulder, 45-64.
- Subrahmanyam, A. (1991) Risk Aversion, Market Liquidity, and Price Efficiency. Review of Financial Studies, 4, 417-441. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/4.3.417
- Foster, F. and Viswanathan, S. (1994) Strategic Trading with Asymmetrically Informed Traders and Long-Lived Information. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, 499-518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331107
- Vives, X. (1995) The Speed of Information Revelation in a Financial Market Mechanism. Journal of Economic Theory, 67, 178-204. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1995.1070
- Lyons, R. (1995) Test of Microstructural Hypotheses in the Foreign Exchange Market. Journal of Financial Economics, 39, 321-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00832-Y
- Christie, W. and Schultz, P. (1994) Why Do Nasdaq Market Makers Avoid Odd-Eight Quotes? Journal of Finance, 49, 1813-1840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04782.x
- Christie, W., Harris, J. and Schultz, P. (1995) Why Did Nasdaq Market Makers Stop Avoiding Odd-Eight Quotes? Journal of Finance, 29, 1841-1860.
- Weston, J. (2000) Competition on the Nasdaq and the Impact of Recent Market Reforms. Journal of Finance, 55, 2565-2598. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00300
- Simaan, Y., Weaver, D. and Whitcomb, D. (2003) Market Maker Quotation Behavior and Pretrade Transparency. Journal of Finance, 58, 1247-1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00565
- Lamoureux, C. and Schnitzlein, C.R. (2004) Microstructure with Multiple Assets: An Experimental Investigation into Direct and Indirect Dealer Competition. Journal of Financial Markets, 7, 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(03)00030-2
- Admati, A. and Pfleiderer, P. (1988) Divide and Conquer: A Theory of Intraday and Day-of-the-Week Mean Effects. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 3-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.3