Systemic Risk in China’s Interbank Lending Market
- 1 Sun Yat-sen Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- 2 Sun Yat-sen Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- 3 Sun Yat-sen Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- 4 Sun Yat-sen Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
We estimate an interbank lending distribution matrix, and then assume that the bankruptcy of a bank triggers a series of losses and other bank bankruptcies to establish an interbank bankruptcy chain network. We then analyze this network using the hyperlink-induced topic search (HITS) algorithm and identify the level of systemic risk. The empirical results show that there is no risk of systemic contagion in the interbank lending market in China. From the perspective of the lending market, China’s banking system is a network composed of core banks including the Bank of China and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Level II banks including the Construction Bank of China, the Agricultural Bank of China, the Bank of Communications, the National Development Bank, and the Industrial Bank, and numerous Level III banks. Considering the influence of the entrance of nonbanking institutions into the interbank lending market, it is found that innovative online financial products have weakened interbank lending relationships to some extent and reduced the possibility of collective collapse caused by relation among banks in a crisis, and have thus facilitated risk diversification.
- Sheldon, G., Maurer, M., et al. (1998) Interbank Lending and Systemic Risk: An Empirical Analysis for Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 134, 685-704.
- Degryse, H. and Nguyen, G. (2004) Interbank Exposures: An Empirical Examination of Systemic Risk in the Belgian Banking System. Cent ER Discussion Paper.
- Toivanen, M. (2009) Financial Interlinkages and Risk of Contagion in the Finnish Interbank Market. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper No. 6/2009.
- Franklin, A. and Douglas, G. (2000)Financial Contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1086/262109
- Upper, C. and Worms, A. (2004) Estimating Bilateral Exposures in the German Interbank Market: Is There a Danger of Contagion? European Economic Review, 48, 827-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.12.009
- Boss, M., Elsinger, H. and Thurner, M.S. (2006) Network Topology of the Interbank Market. Quantitative Finance, 4, 677-684. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680400020325
- Souma, W., Fujiwara, Y. and Aoyama, H. (2003) Complex Networks and Economics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 324, 396-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01858-7
- Lelyveld, I.V. and Liedorp, F. (2006) Interbank Contagion in the Dutch Banking Sector: A Sensitivity Analysis. International Journal of Central Banking, 2, 9-132.
- Mistrulli, P.E. (2007) Assessing Financial Contagion in the Interbank Market: Maximum Entropy versus Observed Interbank Lending Patterns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 1114-1127. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1001681
- Li, Z. and Li, Y. (2005) An Empirical Examination of Contagion Risk in the Interbank Market of China. Finance and Trade Research in Chinese, 6, 51-58.
- Ma, J., Fan, X. and Cao, Y. (2007) Estimating Bilateral Exposures in the China Interbank Market: Is There a Systemic Contagion? Economic Research Journal in Chinese, 1, 68-78.
- Kleinberg, J.M. (1997) Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment. Journal of the ACM, 46, 668-677.
- Hu, D., Zhao, J.L., Hua, Z., et al. (2010) Network-Based Modeling and Analysis of Systemic Risk in Banking Systems. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1269-1291.
- Schneider, M. and Zenios, S. (1990) A Comparative Study of Algorithms for Matrix Balancing. Operations Research, 38, 439-455. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.38.3.439