From Power Curves to Discriminative Power: Measuring Model Performance of LGD Models
- 1 Credit Risk Unit, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (LBBW), Stuttgart, Germany
- 2 Credit Risk Unit, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (LBBW), Stuttgart, Germany
- 3 Credit Risk Unit, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (LBBW), Stuttgart, Germany
Abstract
Measuring model performance of rating systems is a major task for banks. The concept of discrimination, i.e. the discriminative power, is used in credit risk modeling to assess the quality of a risk model concerning the separation of extreme events. For PD models CAP (Cumulative Accuracy Profile) or ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves are used to build a quantity called Accuracy Ratio, which is used to measure the discriminative power. These ideas are well known and broadly used in practice. Although such a measure is also desirable for models of the loss given default (LGD models), it is not documented in the literature. In this note we close this gap. We develop a measure for the discriminative power of LGD models based on Lorenz curves. We study first properties and introduce some alternatives for its calculation from a practical point of view.
- Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR): Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on Prudential Requirements for Credit Institutions and Investment Firms and Amending Regulation (EU) No. 648/2012.
- Bastos, J. (2010) Forecasting Bank Loans Loss-Given-Default. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 2510-2517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.04.011
- Jokivuolle, E. and Peura, S. (2003) Incorporating Collateral Value Uncertainty in Loss Given Default Estimates and Loan-to-Value Ratios. European Financial Management, 9, 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00222
- Jacobs, M. (2010) An Option Theoretic Model for Ultimate Loss-Given-Default with Systematic Recovery Risk and Stochastic Returns on Defaulted Debt. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1551401
- Frontczak, R. and Rostek, S. (2015) Modeling Loss Given Default with Stochastic Collateral. Economic Modelling, 44, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.006
- Ospina, R. and Ferrati, S. (2010) Inflated Beta Distributions. Statistical Papers, 51, 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-008-0125-4
- Huang, X. and Oosterlee, C. (2011) Generalized Beta Regression Models for Random Loss Given Default. The Journal of Credit Risk, 7, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.21314/JCR.2011.150
- Sigrist, F. and Stahel, W. (2011) Using the Censored Gamma Distribution for Modeling Fractional Response Variables with an Application to Loss Given Default. ASTIN Bulletin, 41, 673-710.
- Tong, E., Mues, C. and Thomas, L. (2013) A Zero-Adjusted Gamma Model for Mortgage Loan Loss Given Default. International Journal of Forecasting, 29, 548-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.03.003
- Calabrese, R. and Zenga, M. (2010) Bank Loan Recovery Rates: Measuring and Non-Parametric Density Estimation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 903-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.10.001
- Calabrese, R. (2014) Downturn Loss Given Default: Mixture Distribution Estimation. European Journal of Operational Research, 237, 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.01.043
- Gürtler, M. and Hibbeln, M. (2013) Improvements in Loss Given Default Forecasts for Bank Loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 2354-2366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.031
- Bade, B., Rosch, D. and Scheule, H. (2011) Empirical Performance of Loss Given Default Prediction Models. Journal of Risk Model Validation, 5, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.21314/JRMV.2011.072