A New Way to Compute the Probability of Informed Trading
- 1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, SDM Group, California, USA
- 2 Department of Applied Mathematics, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France
Abstract
Volume-Synchronized Probability of Informed Trading (VPIN) is a tool designed to predict extreme events like flash crashes in high-frequency trading. Its aim is to estimate the Probability of Informed Trading (PIN), which was built from a probabilistic framework. Some concerns have been raised about its theoretical foundations and its reliability. More precisely, it has been shown that theoretically the VPIN does not approximate the PIN as the PIN has been built with a time-clock framework and the VPIN with a volume clock one. On a practical point of view, the VPIN has been found to be sensitive to the starting point of computation of a data set and to different parameters, such as the classification rule. In this paper, in order to improve the PIN theoretical framework, we firstly analyze the theoretical foundations of the PIN and the VPIN models to have a better view of all its different assumption subtleties. It secondly makes it possible to point out some approximation flaws in the formula used to approximate the PIN and to propose another exact way to compute the PIN. All different results are illustrated with simulations.
- Easley, D., Engle, R.F., O’Hara, M. and Wu, L. (2008) Time-Varying Arrival Rates of Informed and Uninformed Trades. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6, 171-207. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbn003
- Easley, D., de Prado, M.L. and O’Hara, M. (2012) The Volume Clock: Insights into the High Frequency Paradigm. Journal of Portfolio Management, 39, 19-29.
- Easley, D., de Prado, M.L. and O’Hara, M. (2012) Flow Toxicity and Liquidity in a High Frequency World. Review of Financial Studies, 25, 1457-1493. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs053
- Easley, D., de Prado, M.L. and O’Hara, M. (2011) The Microstructure of the “Flash Crash”: Flow Toxicity, Liquidity, Crashes and the Probability of Informed Trading. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 37, 118-128. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1695041
- Zheng, Y.M. (2017) VPIN and the China’s Circuit-Breaker. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 9, 126. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v9n12p126
- Abad, D. (2011) From PIN to VPIN: An Introduction to Order Flow Toxicity. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 6, 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srfe.2012.10.002
- Wu, K.S., et al. (2013) A Big Data Approach to Analyzing Market Volatility. Algorithmic Finance, 2, 241-267.
- Easley, D., de Prado, M.L. and O’Hara, M. (2011) The Exchange of Flow Toxicity. The Journal of Trading, 6, 8-13. https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2011.6.2.008
- Andersen, T.G. and Bondarenko, O. (2014) VPIN and the Flash Crash. The Journal of Financial Markets, 17, 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2013.05.005
- Andersen, T.G. and Bondarenko, O. (2014) Reflecting on the VPIN Dispute. Journal of Financial Markets, 17, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2013.08.002
- Andersen, T.G. and Bondarenko, O. (2015) Assessing Measures of Order Flow Toxicity and Early Warning Signals for Market Turbulence. Review of Finance, 19, 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfu041
- Abad, D., Massot, M. and Pascual, R. (2017) Evaluating VPIN as a Trigger for Single-Stock Circuit Breakers. Journal of Banking and Finance, 86, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.08.009
- Pöppe, T., Moss, S. and Schiereck, D. (2016) The Sensitivity of VPIN to the Choice of Trade Classification Algorithm. Journal of Banking and Finance, 73, 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.08.006