Assessing Mechanical Properties of Natural Fibre Reinforced Composites for Engineering Applications
- 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ibogun Campus, Ifo Post Office, Ogun State, Nigeria
- 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lagos City Polytechnic, Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria
- 3 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Landmark University, Omuaran, Kwara State, Nigeria
Abstract
Mechanical properties of ukam, banana, sisal, coconut, hemp and e-glass fibre reinforced laminates were evaluated to assess the possibility of using it as new material in engineering applications. Samples were fabricated by the hand lay-up process (30:70 fibre and matrix ratio by weight) and the properties evaluated using the INSTRON material testing system. The mechanical properties were tested and showed that glass laminate has the maximum tensile strength of 63 MPa, bending strength of 0.5 MPa, compressive strength of 37.75 MPa and the impact strength of 17.82 J/m 2 . The ukam plant fibre laminate has the maximum tensile strength of 16.25 MPa and the impact strength of 9.8J/m among the natural fibres; the sisal laminate has the maximum compressive strength of 42 MPa and maximum bending strength of 0.0036 MPa among the natural fibres. Results indicated that natural fibres are of interest for low-cost engineering applications and can compete with artificial glass fibres (E-glass fibre) when a high stiffness per unit weight is desirable. Results also indicated that future research towards significant improvements in tensile and impact strength of these types of composites should focus on the optimisation of fibre strength rather than interfacial bond strength.
- R. Karnani, M. Krishnan and R. Narayan, “Biofiber-Reinforced Polypropylene Composites,” Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1997, pp. 476-483.
- A. M. Mohd Edeerozey, M. A. Harizan, A. B. Azhar and M. I. Zainal Ariffin, “Chemical Modification of Kenaf Fibers,” Materials Letters, Vol. 61, No. 10, 2007, pp. 2023-2025. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2006.08.006
- E. Robson, “Surface Treatment of Natural Fibre,” EC/ 4316/92, 1993.
- H. A. Sharifah and P. A. Martin, “The Effect of Alkalization and Fibre Alignment on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Kenaf and Hemp Bast Fibre Composites: Part 1—Polyester Resin Matrix,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1219-1230.
- B. F. Yousif, K. J. Wong and N. S. M. El-Tayeb, “An Investigated on Tensile, Compression and Flexural Properties of Natural Fibre Reinforced Polyester Composites,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Seattle, 11-15 November 2007, pp. 619- 624.
- Y. Mohd Yuhazri, P. T. Phongsakorn and H. Sihambing, “A Comparison Process between Vacuum Infusion and Hand Lay-Up Method toward Kenaf/Polyester Composite,” International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2010, pp. 63-66.
- T. Nishino, K. Hirao, M. Kotero, K. Nakamae and H. Inagaki, “Kenaf Reinforced Biodegradable Composite,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 63, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1281-1286. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00099-X
- H. A. Sharifah, P. A. Martin, J. C. Simon and R. P. Simon, “Modified Polyester Resins for Natural Fibre Composites,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 65, No. 3-4, 2005, pp. 525-535. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.08.005
- P. Wamubua, J. Ivens and I. Verpoest, “Natural Fibres: Can They Replace Glass in Fibre Reinforced Plastics?” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 63, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1259-1264. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4
- C. Benjamin and Tobias, “Fabrication and Performance of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composite Material,” 35th International SAMPLE Symposium and Exhibition, Anaheim, 2-5 April 1990, pp. 970-978.
- S. Agbo, “Modelling of Mechanical Properties of a Natural and Synthetic Fiber-Reinforced Cashew Nut Shell Resin Composites,” M.Sc. Thesis, University of Nigeria, 2009.
- A. Stamboulis and C. Baley, “Effects of Environmental Conditions on Mechanical and Physical Properties of Flax Fibres,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 32, No. 8, 2001, pp. 1105-1115.