Effects of Collectors and Frothers on Copper and Molybdenum Coarse Particle Recoveries—A Statistical Approach
- 1 Natural Resources Canada, Canmet Mining, Ottawa, Canada
- 2 Natural Resources Canada, Canmet Mining, Ottawa, Canada
Abstract
Typically, coarse dense mineral particles greater than 150 μm are difficult to float, and the recovery decreases progressively. Various physical parameters can be manipulated in an attempt to increase the recovery. These physical parameters are the following: liberation, turbulence in the flotation cell, pH, collector, frother type and dosage. The testwork discussed in this paper was performed for a copper-molybdenum operation that is experiencing coarse particle (>150 μm) losses in the tails. This operation uses Diesel No. 2 fuel and sodium ethyl xanthate for molybdenum and copper flotation, respectively and X-133 frother. In an attempt to increase coarse particle recovery, stronger collectors (potassium amyl xanthate, Aero 249 and Aero 3501) and frothers (FrothPro 618, FrothPro 630 and FrothPro 706) were used. The analysis was performed using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) approach. The conditions required by the ANOVA method were met. The results showed that the collector potassium amyl xanthate (PAX) with frothers X-133 and FrothPro 630 resulted in approximately 3% increase in copper rougher recovery relative to the baseline (sodium ethyl xanthate and X-133). The collectors and frothers did not have a significant effect on molybdenum recovery within the dosage limits investigated.
- Jameson, G.J. (2010) Advances in Fine and Coarse Particle Flotation. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 49, 325-3320. https://doi.org/10.1179/cmq.2010.49.4.325
- Mehfert, P.J. (2017) Investigating the Potential of HydroFloatTM Coarse Particle Flotation Techniques on Copper Sulphide Ores. 49th Annual Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa, 17-19 January 2017.
- Fosu, S., Skinner, W. and Zanin, M. (2015) Detachment of Coarse Composite Sphalerite Particles from Bubbles in Flotation: Influence of Xanthate Collector Type and Concentration. Minerals Engineering, 71, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2014.10.014
- Trahar, W.J. (1981) A Rational Interpretation of the Role of Particle Size in Flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 8, 289-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(81)90019-3
- Crawford, R. and Ralston, J. (1988) The Influence of Particle Size and Contact Angle in Mineral Flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 23, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(88)90002-6
- Newcombe, B., Bradshaw, D. and Wightman, E. (2012) Flash Flotation…and the Plight of the Coarse Particle. Minerals Engineering, 34, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2012.03.023
- Ata, S. and Jameson, G.J. (2013) Recovery of Coarse Particles in the Froth Phase—A Case Study. Minerals Engineering, 45, 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2013.02.006
- Boulton, A., Fornasiero, D. and Ralston, J. (2003) Characterization of Sphalerite and Pyrite Flotation Samples by XPS and Tof-SIMS. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 70, 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00003-6
- Korkmaz, M.E. and Günay, M. (2018) Finite Element Modelling of Cutting Forces and Power Consumption in Tuning of AISI 420 Martensitic Stainless Steel. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43, 4863-4870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3204-4
- Napier-Munn, T.J. (1995) Detecting Performance Improvements in Trials with Time-Varying Mineral Processes—Three Case Studies. Minerals Engineering, 8, 843-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(95)00047-T
- Montgomery, D.C. (2013) Design and Analysis of Experiments. Eight Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken.