New Method Proving Clausius Inequality
- 1 School of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Suihua College, Suihua, China
Abstract
It is impossible that proving the internal energy change has the relations with volume and pressure. About the second law of thermodynamics, many mistakes of formulations need to be put right and modified, and many new concepts are surveyed too. The equality and inequality on the ratios of internal energy change to temperature and work to temperature are discussed. The relation between the reversible paths and their realistic paths is also researched. In an isothermal process, the internal energy change for the gases is equal to zero, but the internal energy change is not equal to zero for the phase transition or chemical reaction. The Clausius inequality can be derived from the equation calculating the internal energy change in mathematics; it is the new method proving the Clausius inequality. These change laws of thermodynamics could be applied to the gravitational field and mechanical motion and so on.
- Borgnakke, C. and Sonntag, R.E. (2014) Fundamentals of Thermodynamics. 8th Edition, John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore.
- Callen, H.B. (1985) Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatics. 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York.
- Jacobs, P. (2013) Thermodynamics. Imperial College Press, London.
- Jin, C. (2019) Theoretical Physics, 4, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.22606/tp.2019.43001
- Jin, C. (2017) International Journal of Physical Sciences, 12, 205-210. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS2017.4624
- Atkins, P. and Paula, J. (2014) Atkins’ Physical Chemistry. 10th Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Muschik, W. (2014) Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, 39, 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1515/jnet-2014-0016
- Sandler, S.I. and Woodcock, L.V. (2010) Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 55, 4485-4490. https://doi.org/10.1021/je1006828
- Zhang, Z., Drapaca, C., Zhang, Z., Zhang, S., Sun, S. and Liu, H. (2018) Entropy, 20, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20010014
- Dincer, I. and Cengel, Y.A. (2001) Entropy, 3, 116-149. https://doi.org/10.3390/e3030116
- Lucia, U. (2015) Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 419, 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.10.040
- Grazzini, G., Borchiellini, R. and Lucia, U. (2013) Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, 38, 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1515/jnetdy-2013-0008
- Rossini, F.D. and Frandsen, M. (1932) Bureau of Standards Journal of Research, 9, 733-747. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.009.053
- Lee, S., Lee, K. and Lee, J. (2015) Journal of Chemical Education, 9, 771-773. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5007822
- Nieto, R., González, C., Jiménez, á., López, I. and Rodríguez, J. (2011) Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 597-601. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100798p
- Jin, C. (2016) The Inequality of Work Derived from Clausius Inequality and Carnot Theorem. 2016 International Conference on Energy, Power and Electrical Engineering, Shenzhen, 30-31 October 2016, 315-317. https://doi.org/10.2991/epee-16.2016.71
- Levine, I.N. (2012) Physical Chemistry. 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) and Tsinghua University Press Limited, Beijing.