A “Potency-Act” Interpretation of Quantum Physics
- 1 Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica Francesco Severi, Rome, Italy
Abstract
Some considerations are presented on the so called “ontological interpretations” of quantum physics, starting from a remark by Werner Heisenberg on the relation between the probabilistic character of quantum states and the Aristotelian notion of “potency”. We show how an interesting revival of the original idea by Heisenberg can be found in the recent scientific and epistemological literature, in order to solve some paradoxical aspects emerging within some of the usual interpretations of quantum physics. Moreover a way seems to be open in order to rediscover the role of Aristotelian-Thomistic notion of “analogy” of “causal agents” operating even in the physical world. The “Potency-Act” interpretation of quantum physics appears aside the role of the Aristotelian notion of “Form” when it is compared with the recent notion of “information” in the context of the physics of “complex systems” and the biology of “living systems”.
- Penrose, R. (2004) The Road to Reality. A Complete Guid to the Laws of the Universe. Jonathan Cape, London.
- Deutsch, D. (2004) It from Qubit. In: Barrow, J., et al., Eds., Science & Ultimate Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814990.008
- Dür, W. and Heusler, S. (2014) The Physics Teacher, 52, 489. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.1463 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4897588
- Faye, J. (2019) Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/qm-copenhagen
- Vaidman, L. (2018) Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/qm-manyworlds
- Popper, K.R. (1992) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, London and New York.
- Kuhn, T.S. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
- Feyerabend, P. (1993) Against Method. Verso, London.
- Baker, A. (2016) Simplicity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/simplicity
- Zeh, H.D. (1995) Decoherence: Basic Concepts and Their Interpretation. https://arXiv:quant-ph/9506020
- Griffiths, R.B. (2019) The Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-consistent-histories
- Myrvold, W. (2018) Philosophical Issues in Quantum Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/qt-issues
- Lazarou, D.K. (2018) Interpretation of Quantum Theory. An Overview. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3466
- Heisenberg, W. (1962) Physics and Philosophy. Harper (Reprint Penguin Classics, 2000), New York.
- Jaeger, G. (2017) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 375, Article ID: 20160390. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0390
- Silva, I. (2013) Werner Heisenberg and Thomas Aquinas on Natural Indeterminism. The Dominican Council, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Oxford and Malden. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbfr.12036
- Bishop, R.R. and Brenner, J.E. (2017) Potentiality, Actuality and Non-Separability in Quantum and Classical Physics: Res Potentiae in the Macroscopic World. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01471