Non-Uniqueness of Einstein’s Special Relativity, and the Inconclusiveness of High Energy (Relativistic) Physics
- 1 Helios Labs, 945 Hoxett St., Gilroy, CA, USA
- 2 Helios Labs, 945 Hoxett St., Gilroy, CA, USA
Abstract
In this paper, we present a new form of “special relativity” (BSR), which is isomorphic to Einstein’s “special relativity” (ESR). This in turn proves the non-uniqueness of Einstein’s “special relativity” and implies the inconclusiveness of so-called “relativistic physics”. This work presents new results of principal significance for the foundations of physics and practical results for high energy physics, deep space astrophysics, and cosmology as well. The entire exposition is done within the formalism of the Lorentz SL (2 C ) group acting via isometries on real 3-dimensional Lobachevskian (hyperbolic) spaces L 3 regarded as quotients SL (2 C )/ SU (2) . We show via direct calculations that both ESR and BSR are parametric maps from Lobachevskian into Euclidean space, namely a gnomonic (central) map in the case of ESR, and a stereographic map in the case of BSR. Such an identification allows us to link these maps to relevant models of Lobachevskian geometry. Thus, we identify ESR as the physical realization of the Beltrami-Klein (non-conformal) model, and BSR as the physical realization of the Poincare (conformal) model of Lobachevskian geometry. Although we focus our discussion on ball models of Lobachevskian geometry, our method is quite general, and for instance, may be applied to the half-space model of Lobachevskian geometry with appropriate “Lorentz group” acting via isometries on (positive) half space, resulting yet in another “special relativity” isomorphic with ESR and BSR. By using the notion of a homotopy of maps, the identification of “special relativities” as maps from Lobachevskian into Euclidean space allows us to justify the existence of an uncountable infinity of hybrid “special relativities” and consequently an uncountable infinity of “relativistic physics” built upon them. This is another new result in physics and it states that so called “relativistic physics” is unique only up to a homotopy. Finally, we show that “paradoxes” of “special relativities” in either ESR or BSR are simply common distortions of maps between non-isometric spaces. The entire exposition is kept at elementary level accessible to majority of students in physics and/or engineering.
- Anderson, W.A. (1999) Hyperbolic Geometry. Springer, London, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3987-4
- von Brzeski, G. and von Brzeski, V. (2018) Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 1326-1359. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.96081
- von Brzeski, G. (2008) Acta Physica Polonica, B, 39, 1501-1520.
- von Brzeski, G. (2007) Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, 14, 366-369. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920807030107
- Borisovich, Yu., Bliznyakov, N., Izrailevich, Y.A. and Fomenko, T. (1985) Introduction to Topology (English edition). Mir Publishers, Moscow.
- Buseman, H. and Kelly, P.J. (1953) Projective Geometry and Projective Metrics. Academic Press, New York.
- Reynolds, W. (1993) The American Mathematical Monthly, 100, 442-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1993.11990430
- Gelfand, I.M., Grayev, M.I. and Vilenkin, I.Y. (1966) Integral Geometry and Representations Theory. Translated from Russian, Academic Press, New York.
- Gelfand, I.M., Minlos, R.A. and Shapiro, Z.Y. (1963) Representations of the Rotation and Lorentz Groups and their Applications. Pergamon, New York.
- Gorbatsevich, V.V., Onischik, A.L. and Vinberg, E.B. (1997) Foundations of Lie Theory and Lie Transformations Groups. Springer Verlag, Providence, Rhode Island.
- Klein, F. (2000) Forlesungen Uber Nicht Euklidische Geometries. American Mathematical Society, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Greenberg, M. (1993) Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries. 3rd. Edition, Development and History, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
- Einstein, A. (1905) Annalen der Physik, 322, 891-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053221004
- Barrett, J.F. (1994) On Varicack’s Interpretation of Special Relativity in Hyperbolic Space with Application to the Redshift. PIRT Conference, Imperial College, London, September 1994, 17-20.
- Varicak, V. (1912) On the Non Euclidean Interpretation of the Theory of Relativity. Translation from German. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker Vereinigung 21.
- Ramsay, A. and Richtmayer, R.D. (1995) Introduction to Hyperbolic Geometry. Springer, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5585-5