Temporal No-Linearity: An Alternative to Dark Energy
- 1 University of the Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Abstract
Mathematical compatibilities and constraints of a hypothetical 5D space-time with time referenced by two coordinates (3-2) have been revisited in detail in several recent papers. It has been prescribed from the GR the compatibility constraints of the FLRW metric in each temporal brane, to be restricted to Closed Universes, Smooth Initial Singularities, and “Open CTC”. In a first view, this leads to leaving these works considering mathematical games discarded by the Standard Candles data. However, if time would be referred by two coordinates, they would not be linearly related, and it will be mathematically stated that space-time may not be flat in any case because time-like branes geometry will never be. If so, the time scale “lived” over a two-time dimension geodesic necessarily is not constant over its linear projection on one of both coordinates. Consequently, the correlations between Redshift and Distance Modulus—Distance Ladder—may be corrected by a synchronization function (if a no-linear two-time geodesic trajectory over a “warped temporal geometry” is linearly divided into constant segments, then their projections are not linear in any case). We apply an example of time-trajectory over the time slices, matching the Standard Candle data for a Closed Universe dominated by matter (>90%) in a bulk 3-2 configuration, with open temporal branes and smooth singularity. If time can be referred by two coordinates, then there is no need of Darkness to explain astrophysical data and Universe can be closed.
- Förster-Schreiber, N.M., Genzel, R., et al. (2017) Nature, 543, 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21685
- Cinabro, D., Kessler, R., Li, A., Miller, J. and Scolnic, D. (2016) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 466, 884-891. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3109
- Baron, E., Brown, P.J., Milne, P., Roming, P.W.A. and Wang, L. (2015) The Astrophysical Journal, 809, 37. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/37
- Dam, L.H., Heinesen, A. and Wiltshire, D.L. (2017) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 472, 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1858
- Meng, X. and Zhang, P. (2014) Modern Physics Letters A, 29, Article ID: 1450103. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021773231450103X
- Brownstein, J.R. and Moffat, J.W. (2006) The Astrophysical Journal, 636, 721-741. https://doi.org/10.1086/498208
- Milgrom, M. (2015) Canadian Journal of Physics, 93, 107. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2014-0211
- Bekenstein, J.D. (2012) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 5003-5017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0282
- Perez-Torres, M.A., Lundqvist, P., Beswick, R.J., Bjornsson, C.I., Muxlow, T.W.B., Paragi, Z., Ryder, S., Alberdi, A., Fransson, C., Marcaide, J.M., Marti-Vidal, I., Ros, E., Argo, M.K. and Guirado, J.C. (2014) The Astrophysical Journal, 792, 38. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/38
- Nielsen, J., Guffanti, A. and Sarkar, S. (2016) Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 35596. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35596
- Bezares, M. and Bona, C. (2019) Physical Review D, 100, Article ID: 043509.
- Bezares, M., Bona, C., Pons-Rullán, B. and Vigano, D. (2019) Physical Review D, 99, Article ID: 043530.
- Bona, C. (2019) The Horizon Problem as a Clue: A Smooth Big Bang?
- Afshordi, N., Coriano, C., Delle Rose, L., Gould, E. and Skenderis, K. (2017) Physical Review Letters, 118, Article ID: 041301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.041301
- Hartle, J.B. and Hawking, S.W. (1983) Physical Review D, 28, 2960-2975. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2960
- Pons-Rullán, B. (2017) Journal of Physical Mathematics, 8, Article ID: 1000234.
- Novikov, I.D. (1965) Soviet Astronomy. AJ, 8, 857-863.