Prediction of Radioactive Half-Lives and Atomic Nucleus Dimensions in a Concentric Shell Model or Flocon Model
- 1 Société d’Astronomie des Pyrénées Occidentales, Pau, France
Abstract
Considering only the wave aspect, we determine the energy of a bond between 2 nucleons; this quantified energy is associated with a standing wave. Then, starting from the mass loss corresponding to this energy, we determine the number of bonds in this nucleus. The mass defect value for a link is used to determine a specific length at that link. Fixing a precise distance between nucleons makes it possible to determine a geometry of the nucleus and its dimensions. It makes it possible to understand when this bond is stronger than the electrostatic force and allows deducing a shell model built in a precise order. The calculation on the mass defect will also make it possible to determine that one or more nucleons concerned by the radioactivity will be bound by a single bond to the rest of the nucleus or, on the contrary, bound by several bonds which induce short 1/2 lives or, on the contrary, very long. The analysis of the bonds on H, He and C make it possible to write formulae which are then applied to the nuclei to find the radioactive 1/2 lives. To find by equations the radioactive 1/2 lives does not call into question the standard model since it concerns only the defect of mass of the nuclei with energies that are not used to find the main particles of the standard model. This model, which favours a geometric approach to the detriment of a mathematical approach based on differential equations, can lead to theoretical questions about the possibility of interpreting the structure of the nucleus in a more undulatory way. It is possible to explain radioactivity in a more deterministic way.
- Xiong, W., Gasparian, A., Gao, H., et al. (2019) Nature, 575, 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2
- Sazdjian, H. (2013) Ondes: Cordes Vibrantes, Ondes Sonores, Ondes Optiques. Thèse, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay.
- Audi, G., Wapstra, A.H., Thibault, C., Blachot, J. and Bersillon, O. (2003) Nuclear Physics A, 729, 3-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.001
- de Laeter, J.R., Böhlke, J.K., De Bièvre, P. (2003) Pure and Applied Chemistry, 75, 683-800. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375060683
- Wieser, M.E. (2006) Pure and Applied Chemistry, 78, 2051-2066. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200678112051
- Holden, N.E. and Lide, D.R. (dir.) (2004) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 85e éd., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2712 p.
- Krauth, J.J. et al. (2021) Nature, 589, 527-531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03183-1
- Ebran, J.P., Khan, E., Niksic, T. and Vretenar, D. (2014) Physical Review C, 90, Article ID: 054329. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054329
- Mutschler, A., Lemasson, A., Sorlin, O., et al. (2017) Nature Physics, 13, 152-156. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3916
- Duguet, T., Somà, V., Lecluse, S., Barbieri, C. and Navrátil, P. (2017) Physical Review C, 95, Article ID: 034319. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034319