Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
An SU(3) Electroweak Unified Model Using Generalized Yang-Mills Theory
School of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
School of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
School of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- 1 School of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
- 2 School of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
- 3 School of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
- 4 School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- 5 School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
Journal of Modern Physics·Volume 13 (2022)·Pages 1403–1410·Published 31 October 2022·DOI10.4236/jmp.2022.1311087
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Generalized Yang-Mills theory has a covariant derivative which contains both vector and scalar gauge bosons. Based on this theory, we construct an SU (3) unified model of electromagnetic and weak interactions to simplify the Weinberg-Salam model. By using the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio mechanism, the symmetry breaking can be realized dynamically. The masses of W ± , Z 0 are obtained and interactions between various particles are the same as that of the Weinberg-Salam model. At the same time, sin 2 θ w =1/4 can be given.
KeywordsYang-Mills TheoryDynamical Symmetry BreakingNambu-Jona-Lasinio Mechanism
- Goldstone, J., Salam, A. and Weinberg, S. (1962) Physical Review, 127, 965-970. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.127.965
- Weinberg, S. (1967) Physical Review Letters, 19, 1264-1266. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264
- Weinberg, S. (1972) Physical Review D, 5, 1962. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.5.1962
- Chatrchyan, S., Khachatryan, V., Sirunyan, A.M., et al. (2012) Physics Letters B, 716, 30-61.
- Aad, G., Abajyan, T., Abbott, B., et al. (2012) Physics Letters B, 716, 1-29.
- Fairlie, D.B. (1979) Physics Letters B, 82, 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90434-9
- Neeman, Y. (1979) Physics Letters B, 81, 190-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90521-5
- Zhou, G.Z. and Gao, C.S. (1980) Chinese Physics C, 4, 609-622.
- Chaves, M. and Morales, H. (1998) Modern Physics Letters A, 13, 2021-2023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732398002126
- Langmann, E. (2001) Journal of Mathematical Physics, 42, 5238-5259. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1399297
- Chaves, M. and Morales, H. (2000) Modern Physics Letters A, 15, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732300000190
- Wang, D.F. and Song, H.S. (2005) Communications in Theoretical Physics, 43, 1083-1086. https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/43/6/025
- Wang, D.F. and Song, H.S. (2006) Communications in Theoretical Physics, 45, 297-300. https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/45/2/022
- Wang, D.F. and Zhong, H.Y. (2008) Communications in Theoretical Physics, 50, 703-706. https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/50/3/36
- Higgs, P.W. (1964) Physics Letters, 12, 132-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9
- Nambu, Y. and Jona-Lasinio, G. (1961) Physical Review, 122, 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122.345
- Wang, D.F., Liang, X. and Guo, Y.Q. (2020) Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 448-454. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.113028