The Progenitor of the Big Bang and Its Connection to the Flatness and Acceleration of the Universe
- 1 IWR, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Abstract
It was argued that old and massive neutron stars end up as black objects that are made of purely incompressible superconducting gluon-quark superfluid matter (henceforth SuSu-objects). Based on theoretical investigations and numerical solving of the field equations with time-dependent spacetime topologies, I argue that a dense cluster of SuSu-objects at the background of flat spacetime that merged smoothly is a reliable candidate for the progenitor of the big bang. Here, we present and use a new time-dependent spacetime metric, which unifies the metrics of Minkowski, Schwarzschild, and Friedmann as well as a modified TOV-equation for modeling dynamical contractions of relativistic objects. Had the progenitor undergone an abrupt decay, a hadronizing front forms at its surface and starts propagating from outside-to-inside, thereby hadronizing its entire content and changing the topology of the embedding spacetime from a flat into a dynamically expanding curved one. For an observer located at the center of the progenitor, H 0 , the universe would be seen as isotropic and homogeneous, implying therefore that the last big bang event must have occurred in our neighborhood. For the curved spacetime re-converges into a flat one, whereas the outward-propagation topological front, which separates the enclosed curved spacetime from the exterior flat one, would appear spatially and temporally accelerating outwards. The here-presented scenario suggests possible solutions to the flatness problem, the origin of acceleration of the universe and the pronounced activities of high redshift QSOs. We anticipate that future observations by the James-Webb-Telescope to support our scenario when active QSOs with z >12 would be detected.
- Bromm, V. (2013) Formation of the First Stars.
- Laporte, N., Meyer, R.A., Ellis, R.S., et al. (2021) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 505, 3336-3346. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1239
- Diehl, R., Halloin, H., Kretschmer, K., et al. (2006) Nature, 439, 45-47. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04364
- Sartore, N., Ripamonti, E., Treves, A. and Turolla, R. (2010) Astronomy & Astrophysics, 510, A23. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912222
- Fan, X., Wang, F., Yang, J., et al. (2019) The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 870, L11. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaeffe
- Oesch, P.A., et al. (2016) The Astrophysical Journal, 819, 129.
- Espinoza, C.M., Lyne, A.G., Stappers, B.W. and Kramer, C. (2011) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 414, 1679-1704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18503.x
- Roy, J., Gupta, Y. and Lewandowski, W. (2012) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 424, 2213-2221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21380.x
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2018) Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 554-572. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.94038
- Hujeirat, A.A. and Samtaney, R. (2019) Journal of Modern Physics, 10, 1696-1712. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2019.1014111
- Ashton, G., Lasky, P.D., Graber, V. and Pal-freyman, J. (2019) Rotational Evolution of the Vela Pulsar during the 2016 Glitch.
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2020) Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 1779-1784. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.1111110
- Glendenning, N.K. (2007) Special and General Relativity. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-47109-9
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2021) Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 937-958. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.127057
- Lee, T.D. (1979) Lecture at Columbia University.
- Donoghue, J.F. (1980) Physical Review D, 22, 1780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1780
- Shuryak, E.V. (2004) Nuclear Physics A, 750, 64-83.
- Pasechnik, R. and Sumbera, M. (2017) Universe, 3, Article No. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe3010007
- Guth, A.H. (1981) Physical Review D, 23, Article No. 347. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347