Why the Energy Density of the Universe Is Lower and Upper-Bounded? Relaxing the Need for the Cosmological Constant
- 1 IWR, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Abstract
Recently, it was argued that the energy density of the supranuclear dense matter inside the cores of massive neutron stars must have reached the , beyond which supranuclear dense matter becomes incompressible entropy-free gluon-quark superfluid. As this matter is also confined and embedded in flat spacetime, it is Lorentz invariant and could be treated as vacuum. The lower bound of matter in the universe may be derived using the following observational constraints: 1) The average energy density of the observable universe is erg/cc, 2) The observable universe is remarkably flat, and 3) the Hubble constant is a slowly decreasing function of cosmic time. Based thereon, I argue that the energy density in nature should be bounded from below by the average density of our vast and flat parent universe, , which is, in turn, comparable to the vacuum energy density , and amounts to erg/cc. When the total energy density is measured relative to , then both GR and Newtonian field equations may consistently model the gravitational potential of the parent universe without invoking cosmological constants. Relying on the recently proposed unicentric model of the observable universe, UNIMOUN, the big bang must have warped the initially flat spacetime into a curved one, though the expansion of the fireball doomed the excited energy state to diffuse out and return back to the ground energy state that governs the flat spacetime of our vast parent universe.
- Einstein, A. (1917) Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitatstheorie. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 142-152.
- Perlmutter, S., et al. (1999) The Astrophysical Journal, 517, 565-586.
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2023) Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 183-197. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2023.143013
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2023) Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 415-431. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2023.144023
- Sato, K. (1981) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 195, 467-479. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/195.3.467
- Trimble, V. (1987) Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 425-472. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.002233
- Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., et al. (2021) In the Realm of the Hubble Tension—A Review of Solutions.
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2022) Journal of Modern Physics, 13, 1474-1498. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2022.1311091
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2022) Journal of Modern Physics, 13, 1581-1597.
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2021) Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 937-958. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.127057
- Bennett, C.L., Larson, D., et al. (2013) The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 208, 54.
- Weinberg, S. (1989) Reviews of Modern Physics, 61, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1
- Carroll, S.M., Press, W.H. and Turner, E.L. (1992) Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 30, 499-542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002435
- Ellis, G.R. and van Elst, H. (1998) NATO Science Series. Series C, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 541, 1-116.
- Hobson, M.P., Efstathiou, G. and Lasenby, A.N. (2015) General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790904
- Hujeirat, A.A. (2018) Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 554-572. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.94038
- Espinoza, C.M., Lyne, A.G., Stappers, B.W. and Kramer, C. (2011) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 414, 1679-1704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18503.x
- Roy, J., Yashwant Gupta, Y. and Lewandowski, W. (2012) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 424, 2213-2221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21380.x