The Bell Inequality, Inviolable by Data Used Consistently with Its Derivation, Is Satisfied by Quantum Correlations Whose Probabilities Satisfy the Wigner Inequality
- 1 Institute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA & Burtonsville, MD, USA
- 2 Inspire Institute, Inc., Alexandria, USA
Abstract
It is not generally known that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of ±1’s that are writable on paper. This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell’s inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets. For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, non-local, deterministic, random, or nonsensical. It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross-correlated data sets that can exist, or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data-pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation. In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them. A new inequality is then produced: The Wigner inequality, that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments. If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.
- Bell, J.S. (1964) Chap. 2. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. In: Bell, J.S., Ed., Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 14-21.
- Bell, J.S. (1964) Chap. 8. Locality in Quantum Mechanics: Reply to Critics. In: Bell, J.S., Ed., Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 63-66.
- De Raedt, H., Hess, K. and Michielsen, K. (2011) Extended Boole-Bell Inequalities Applicable to Quantum Theory. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 8, 1011-1039. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2011.1781
- Sica, L. (1999) Bell’s Inequalities I: An Explanation for Their Experimental Violation. Optics Communications, 170, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00417-4
- Sica, L. (2020) The Bell Inequalities: Identifying What Is Testable and What Is Not. Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 725-740. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.115047
- Sica, L. (2002) Correlations for a New Bell’s Inequality Experiment. Foundations of Physics Letters, 15, 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023920230595
- Papoulis, A. (1965) Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. McGraw Hill, Boston, 238.
- Papoulis, A. (1965) Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. McGraw Hill, Boston, Chap. 9.
- Kwiat, P.G., et al. (1995) New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs. Physical Review Letters, 75, 4337-4342. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4337
- Redhead, M. (1992) Incompleteness Nonlocality and Realism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 84.
- Hess, K. (2022) A Critical Review of Works Pertinent to the Einstein-Bohr Debate and Bell’s Theorem. Symmetry, 14, 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010163
- Vorobev, N.N. (1962) Consistent Families of Measures and Their Extensions. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 7, 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1137/1107014
- Lad, F. (2021) Quantum Violation of Bell’s Inequality: A Misunderstanding Based on a Mathematical Error of Neglect. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 1109-1144. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.128067
- Kupczynski, M. (2020) Is the Moon There if Nobody Looks: Bell Inequalities and Physical Reality. Frontiers in Physics, 8, Article No. 273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00273