Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry from Preon Condensation Prior to the Hadron Epoch
- 1 Innoven Energy, Inc., Solana Beach, USA
Abstract
A universe consisting of protons, neutrons, and electrons with electrical neutrality is consistent with an equal number of c and preons, assuming the rishon preon theory of Shupe and Harari. Similarly, a universe consisting of antiprotons, antineutrons, and positrons with electrical neutrality is consistent with an equal number of c and preons. Hence, any combination of such matter-antimatter compositions is also consistent with an equal number of c and preons and overall electrical neutrality. It is proposed that the difference observed in baryon-antibaryon number density relative to photon number density, ~5 × 10 -10 , is due to allocation of preons between matter and antimatter during preon condensation into normal matter. Three approaches of increasing rigor and complexity are considered: 1) an allocation at times corresponding to the Planck temperature due to fluctuations, 2) an allocation at times corresponding to quark formation due to preon bonding, and 3) an allocation at times corresponding to the electroweak scale. All approaches can give the correct order of magnitude of the asymmetry assuming out-of-equili-brium freeze-out and a slight and allowed charge ( C ) asymmetry in preon condensation in a self-consistent quantum field theory. Sakharov’s baryon non-conservation condition is evidently circumvented with these approaches, because they assume another level of matter (preons) which is present before quark formation. Thus, preons can provide an elementary explanation of primordial matter-antimatter asymmetry. A relationship between Higgs boson states and preons is proposed.
- Harari, H. (1979) Physics Letters B, 86, 83-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90626-9
- Shupe, M. (1979) Physics Letters B, 86, 87-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90627-0
- D’Souza, I.A. and Kalman, C.S. (1992) Preons: Models of Leptons, Quarks, and Gauge Bosons as Composite Objects. World Scientific Press, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1142/1700
- Sakharov, A.D. (1967) JETP Letters, 5, 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1991v034n05ABEH002497
- Holmes, R. (2021) A Quantum Field Theory with Permutational Symmetry. 2nd Edition, Lambert Academic Press, Riga. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5047237
- Harrison, P.F. and Scott, W.G. (1994) Physics Letters B, 78, 471-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)90170-8
- Weinberg, S. (2008) Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1086/10.1086/163168
- Kolb, E. and Turner, M. (1990) The Early Universe. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429492860
- Zyla, P.A. Barnett, R.M., Beringer, J., Dahl, O., Dwyer, D.A., et al. (2020) Progress in Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2020, 083C01. Big Bang Cosmology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptaa104
- Farrar, G.R. and Shaposhnikov, M.E. (1993) Physical Review Letters, 70, 2833-2836. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2833
- Farrar, G.R. and Shaposhnikov, M.E. (1993) Technical Report RU-93-11, CERN-TH.6732/92, Rutgers/CERN.
- Huet, P. and Sather, E. (1995) Physical Review D, 51, 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.379
- Morrissey, D.E. and Ramsey-Musolf, M.J. (2012) New Journal of Physics, 14, Article ID: 125003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/125003
- Bruggisser, S., Konstandin, T. and Servant, G. (2017) Journal of Cosmology and Astrophysics, 11, 034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/11/034
- Fukugita, M. and Yanagida, T. (1986) Physics Letters B, 174, 45-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)91126-3
- Fong, S.C., Nardi, E. and Riotto, A. (2012) Advances in High Energy Physics, 2012, Article ID: 158303. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/158303
- Workman, R.L., Burkert, V.D., Crede, V., Klempt, E., Thoma, U., et al. (2022) Progress in Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022, 083C01. Electron. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac097