Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Observation about the Classical Electromagnetic Gauge Transformation and Its Quantum Correspondence
Departamento de Física, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
Departamento de Física, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
- 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
- 2 Departamento de Física, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
Journal of Modern Physics·Volume 15 (2024)·Pages 474–479·Published 18 March 2024·DOI10.4236/jmp.2024.154022
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Using the Landau and symmetric gauges for the vector potential of a constant magnetic field and the quantum problem of a charged particle moving on a flat surface, we show the classical electromagnetic gauge transformation does not correspond to a one-dimensional unitary group transformation U(1) of the wave function for the quantum case. In addition, with the re-examination of the relation between the magnetic field B and its vector potential A , we found that, in order to have a consistent formulation of the dynamics of the charged particle with both expressions, we must have that B = ∇ × A if and only if B ≠ 0 .
KeywordsGauge TransformationHarmonic OscillatorQuantum Hall EffectElectromagnetic Potentials
- Kane, G. (1987) Modern Elementary Particle Physics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston.
- Weyl, H. (1946) The Classical Group Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Bohm, A., Mostafazadeh, A., Koizumi, H., Niu, Q. and Zwanziger, J. (2003) The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems: Foundations, Mathematical Concepts, and Applications in Molecular and Condensed Matter Physics. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10333-3
- Jackson, J.D. (2002) American Journal of Physics, 70, 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1491265
- Yang, C.N. and Mills, R.L. (1954) Physical Review, 96, 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.96.191
- Lasenby, A., Chris, D. and Gull, S. (1998) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 356, 487-582. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1998.0178
- Kleinert, H. (1989) Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1142/0356
- Originos, K. (2012) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 403, Article ID: 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/403/1/012043
- Jackson, J.D. (1999) Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 181-240.
- Elbaz, E. (1995) The Quantum Theory of Particles, Fields, and Cosmology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 491-494.
- Feynman, R.P. (1950) Physical Review, 80, 440-457. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.80.440
- Wilson, K.G. (1974) Physical Review D, 10, 2445-2459. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445
- Schwinger, J. (1962) Physical Review, 125, 397-398. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.125.397
- Schwinger, J. (2001) Quantum Mechanics, Symbolism of Atomic Measurements, Chapter 8.7.
- O’Raifeartaigh, L. and Straumann, N. (2000) Reviews of Modern Physics, 72, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.72.1
- López, G.V. and Lizarraga, J.A. (2020) Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 1731-1742. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.1110106
- Lizarraga, J.A. and López, G.V. (2023) Revista Mexicana de Física, 69, Article ID: 010502. https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.69.010502
- López, G.V., Lizarraga, J.A. and Bravo, O.J.P. (2021) Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 1404-1414. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.1210088