The extra precession of Mercury—42.9 seconds of arc per century—explained by General Relativity (GR), is the result of a secular addition of 5.02 × 10 −7 rad. at the end of every orbit around the Sun. We will analyze the instantaneous precession and its addition along one orbit, find out the magnitude of oscillations over the mean value, comparing key theoretical proposals. This angular instantaneous precession should be the result reaction of Mercury to the gravitoelectric/magnetic action produced by the geometric curve space-time at each single point of the elliptic orbit. The better we should know about this precession, the better we will determine the external action whatever the perturbing source is. The Doppler tracking of the MESSENGER spacecraft produces only 1 m error, enough precision to deduce the complete geodesic orbit of Mercury as an open free-fall path, isolated from other planets gravitational interference. The aim of this article is also to encourage JPL, IMCCE and other scientific teams to do so because, as far as I know, it has not been yet entirely measured by accurately tracking that motion.
Wilczek, F. and Krauss, L. (2014) Using Cosmology to Establish the Quantization of Gravity. Physical Review D , 89, Article 047501. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.89.047501
Adelberger, E., Nordtvedt, K., Williams, J., et al. (2009) Opportunities for Probing Funda-Mental Gravity with Solar System Experiments. Astro2010: Science White Papers 300.
Iorio, L. (2023) Might the 2PN Perihelion Precession of Mercury Become Measurable in the Next Future? Universe , 9, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9010037
Pogossian, S.P. (2022) Comparative Study of Mercury’s Perihelion Advance. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy , 134, Article No. 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10085-5
Soffel, M. (1989) Relativity in Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics and Geodesy. Springer-Verlag. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-73406-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73406-9
Soffel, M. and Wen-Biao, H. (2019) Theory and Applications in Astronomy, Celestial Mechanics and Metrology. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-19673-8
Park, R.S., Folkner, W.M., Konopliv, A.S., Williams, J.G., Smith, D.E. and Zuber, M.T. (2017) Precession of Mercury’s Perihelion from Ranging to the Messenger Spacecraft. The Astronomical Journal , 153, Article 121. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa5be2 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/aa5be2
Fienga, A. and Minazzoli, O. (2024) Testing Theories of Gravity with Planetary Ephemerides. Living Reviews in Relativity , 27, Article No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-023-00047-0
Misner, C., Thorne, K. and Wheeler, J. (1973) Gravitation. Francisco Freeman & Co. https://www.academia.edu/39851352/Misner_Thorne_Wheeler_Gravitation_Freeman_1973_
Carroll, S. (2004) Spacetime and Geometry. Addison Wesley. https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/spacetimeandgeometry/
Berry, M. (1976) Principles of Cosmology and Gravitation. Cambridge University Press.
Muñoz, G. (2003) Vector Constants of the Motion and Orbits in the Coulomb/Kepler Problem. American Journal of Physics , 71, 1292-1293. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1596174
Davies, B. (1983) Elementary Theory of Perihelion Precession. American Journal of Physics , 51, 909-911. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.13382
Stewart, M.G. (2005) Precession of the Perihelion of Mercury’s Orbit. American Journal of Physics , 73, 730-734. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1949625
Bootello, J. (2012) Angular Precession of Elliptic Orbits. Mercury. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics , 2, 249-255. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2012.24032 https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=26294
Bootello, J. (2013) Perturbing Potential and Orbit Dynamics. Journal of Modern Physics , 4, 207-212. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.48a020
Bootello, J. (2015) Flyby Orbits and Perturbing Potential. Advances in Space Research , 56, 664-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.04.023
Flanders, W.D. and Japaridze, G.S. (2002) Gravitational Interaction between Moving Objects in Terms of Spatial Gravitational Fields. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 41, 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014257523781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1014257523781
Levy, M. (1890) Sur l’application des lois electrodynamique au mouvement des planets. Comptes Rendus de l ’ Académie des Sciences , 110, 545-551. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k30663/f587n7.capture
Assis, K. (1992) On the Absorption of Gravity. Apeiron , 13, 1-11. https://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~assis/Apeiron-V13-p3-11(1992)
Landau, L. and Lifshitz, M. (1976) Mechanics. Butterwoth-Heinemann.
Adkins, G.S. and McDonnell, J. (2007) Orbital Precession Due to Central-Force Perturbations. Physical Review D , 75, Article 082001. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.75.082001
Melnikov, V. and Kolosnitsyn, N. (2004) New Observational Tests of Non-Newtonian Inter-Actions at Planetary and Binary Pulsar Orbital Distances. Gravitation and Cosmology , 10, 137-140. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004GrCo...10..137K/abstract
Iorio, L. (2018) Is It Possible to Measure New General Relativistic Third-Body Effects on the Orbit of Mercury with Bepicolombo? The European Physical Journal C , 78, Article No. 549. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6011-x
Balogh, A. and Giampieri, G. (2002) Mercury: The Planet and Its Orbit. Reports on Progress in Physics , 65, 529-560. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/65/4/202 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/65/4/202
McDonald, K. (2023) Special Relativity and the Precession of the Perihelion. http://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/examples/perihelion.pdf
Edvardsson, S. (2023) Relativistic Gravitational Force. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy , 135, Article No. 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-023-10138-3
Adelberger, E.G., Heckel, B.R. and Nelson, A.E. (2003) Tests of Thegravitationalinverse-Squarelaw. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , 53, 77-121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.53.041002.110503
Tedesco, A., Capolupo, A. and Lambiase, G. (2024) Relativistic Periastron Advance Beyond Einstein Theory: Analytical Solution with Applications. The European Physical Journal C , 84, Article No. 811. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13028-6
Park, R.S., Folkner, W.M., Williams, J.G. and Boggs, D.H. (2021) The JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE440 and De441. The Astronomical Journal , 161, Article 105. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abd414 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/abd414
Fienga, A., Laskar, J., Deram, P., Viswanathan, V., Di Ruscio, A., Bernus, L., Durante, D. and Gastineau, M. (2019) INPOP19a Planetary Ephemerides. Notes Scientifiques et Techniques de l’Institut de Mécanique Céleste et de Calcul des Éphémérides, S109. https://hal.science/hal-02470929/file/inpop19a_20191214.pdf