Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
An Arbitrated Quantum Signature Scheme Based on Chaotic Quantum Encryption Algorithm
School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea
Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea
- 1 School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 2 School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 3 Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea
- 4 Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea
Journal of Modern Physics·Volume 04 (2013)·Pages 83–88·Published 30 May 2013·DOI10.4236/jmp.2013.45B014
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
An arbitrated quantum signature (AQS) scheme is demonstrated via the improved quantum chaotic encryption algorithm with the quantum one-time pad based on chaotic operation string. In this scheme, the signatory signs the message and the receiver verifies the signature's validity with the aid of the arbitrator who plays a crucial role when a dispute arises. Analysis shows that the signature can neither be forged nor disavowed by the malicious attacker.
KeywordsComponentFormattingStyleStylingInsert
- M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, “Quantum computation and quantum information,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
- G. Zeng and C. H. Keitel, “Arbi-trated Quantum-Signature Scheme,” Physical Review A, Vol. 65, No. 4, 2002, 04231 2. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042312
- G. H. Zeng, “Reply to ‘Comment on Arbitrated Quantum-Signature Scheme’,” Physical Review A, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2008, 016301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.016301
- D. Gottesman and I. Chuang, arXiv:quant-ph/0105031v2.
- P. O. Boykin and V. Roychowdhury, “Optimal Encryption of Quantum Bits,” Physical Review A, Vol. 67, No. 4, 2003, 042317 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.042317
- G. Zou and D. Qiu, “Security Analysis and Improvements of Ar-bitrated Quantum Signature Schemes,” Physical Review A, Vol. 82, No. 4, 2010, 042325. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.042325
- Q. Li, W. H. Chan and D. Y. Long, “Arbitrated Quantum Signature Scheme Using Bell States,” Physical Review A, Vol. 79. No. 5, 2009, 054307. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.79.054307
- T. Hwang, Y. Luo and S. Chong, “Comment on ‘Security Analysis and Improvements of Arbitrated Quantum Signature Schemes’,” Physical Review A, Vol. 85, No.5, 2012, 056301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.056301
- Q. Y. Cai, “The ‘Ping-Pang’ Protocol Can Be Attacked without Eavesdropping,” Physical Review letters, Vol. 91, 2003, 109801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.109801
- A. K. Ekert, “Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell's Theorem,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 67, No. 6, 1991, pp. 661-663. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
- C. H. Bennett, “Quantum Cryptography Using Any Two Nonorthogonal,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 68, 1992, pp. 3121-3124. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3121
- S. K. Chong, Y. P. Luo and T. Hwang, “On ‘Arbitrated Quantum Signature of Classical Messages Against Collective Amplitude Damping Noise’,” Optics Communications, Vol. 284, No. 3, 2011, pp. 893-895. doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.09.080
- J. W. Choi, K. Y. Chang and D. Hong, “Security Problem on Arbitrated Quantum Signature Schemes,” Physical Review A, Vol. 84. No. 6, 2011, 062330. 84, 062330. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062330.
- F. Gao, S.-J. Qin, F.-Z. Guo and Q.-Y. Wen, “Cryptanalysis of the Arbitrated Quantum Signature Protocols,” Physical Review A, Vol. 84, 2011, 022344. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.022344