Key Role of Hybridization between Actinide 5<i>f</i> and Oxygen 2<i>p</i> Orbitals for Electronic Structure of Actinide Dioxides
- 1 Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
- 2 Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
- 3 1Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan 2Advanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan
Abstract
In order to promote our understanding on electronic structure of actinide dioxides, we construct a tight-binding model composed of actinide 5 f and oxygen 2 p electrons, which is called f - p model. After the diagonalization of the f - p model, we compare the eigen-energies in the first Brillouin zone with the results of relativistic band-structure calculations. Here we emphasize a key role of f - p hybridization in order to understand the electronic structure of actinide dioxides. In particular, it is found that the position of energy levels of Г 7 and Г 8 states determined from crystalline electric field (CEF) potentials depends on the f - p hybridization. We investiagte the values of the Slater-Koster integrals for f - p hybridization, ( fpσ ) and ( fpπ ), which reproduce simultaneously the local CEF states and the band-structure calculation results. Then, we find that the absolute value of ( fpπ ) should be small in comparison with ( fpσ ) = 1 eV. The small value of |( fpπ )| is consistent with the condition to obtain the octupole ordering in the previous analysis of the f - p model.
- P. Santini, R. Lémanski and P. Erdos, Advances in Physics, Vol. 48, 1999, pp. 537-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/000187399243419
- T. Hotta, Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 69, 2006, pp. 2061-2155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/69/7/R02
- P. Santini, S. Carretta, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuffo, N. Magnani and G. H. Lander, Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 81, 2009, pp. 807-863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.807
- E. F. Westrum Jr., J. B. Hatcher and D. W. Osborne, Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 21, 1953, pp. 419-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1698923
- J. W. Ross and D. J. Lam, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 38, 1967, pp. 1451-1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1709662
- P. Erdos, G. Solt, Z. Zolnierek, A. Blaise and J. M. Fournier, Physica B + C, Vol. 102, 1980, pp. 164-170.
- J. M. Fournier, A. Blaise, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuffo, J. Larroque, M. T. Hutchings, R. Osborn and A. D. Taylor, Physical Review B, Vol. 43, 1991, pp. 1142-1145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.1142
- P. Santini and G. Amoretti, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 85, 2000, pp. 2188-2191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2188
- J. A. Paixao, C. Detlefs, M. J. Longfield, R. Caciuffo, P. Santini, N. Bernhoeft, J. Rebizant and G. H. Lander, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, 2002, Article ID: 187202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.187202
- R. Caciuffo, J. A. Paixao, C. Detlefs, M. J. Longfield, P. Santini, N. Bernhoeft, J. Rebizant and G. H. Lander, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 15, 2003, pp. S2287-S2296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/15/28/370
- S. W. Lovesey, E. Balcar, C. Detlefs, G. van der Laan, D. S. Sivia and U. Staub, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 15, 2003, pp. 4511-4518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/15/26/301
- A. Kiss and P. Fazekas, Physical Review B, Vol. 68, 2003, Article ID: 174425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.174425
- Y. Tokunaga, Y. Homma, S. Kambe, D. Aoki, H. Sakai, E. Yamamoto, A. Nakamura, Y. Shiokawa, R. E. Walstedt and H. Yasuoka, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 94, 2005, Article ID: 137209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.137209
- N. Magnani, S. Carretta, R. Caciuffo, P. Santini, G. Amoretti, A. Hiess, J. Rebizant and G. H. Lander, Physical Review B, Vol. 78, 2008, Article ID: 104425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.104425