Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Diamond as a Solid State Quantum Computer with a Linear Chain of Nuclear Spins System
Departamento de Fsica de la Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México
Departamento de Fsica de la Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México
- 1 Departamento de Fsica de la Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México
- 2 Departamento de Fsica de la Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México
Journal of Modern Physics·Volume 05 (2014)·Pages 55–60·Published 15 January 2014·DOI10.4236/jmp.2014.51009
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
By removing a 12 C atom from the tetrahedral configuration of the diamond, replac ing it by a 13 C atom, and repeating this in a linear direction, it is possible to have a linear chain of nuclear spins one half and to build a solid state quantum computer. One qubit rotation, controlled-not (CNOT) and controlled-controlled-not (CCNOT) quantum gates are obtained immediately from this configuration. CNOT and CCNOT quantum gates are used to determined the design parameters of this quantum computer.
KeywordsQuantum ComputerControlled-Not GateDiamond
- H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, “The Theory of Open Quantum Systems,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.
- A. O. Caldeira and A. T. Legget, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 121, 1983, pp. 587-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(83)90013-4
- W. G. Unruh and W. H. Zurek, Physical Review D, 1989, Vol. 40, pp. 1071-1094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.40.1071
- B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz and Y. Zhang, Physical Review D, Vol. 45, 1992, pp. 2843-2861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.2843
- A. Venugopalan, Physical Review A, Vol. 56, 1997, pp. 4307-4310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4307
- H. D. Zeh, Foundations of Physics, Vol. 3, 1973, pp. 109-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00708603
- J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek, Proc. Les Houches, Vol. 111A, 1997, p. 409.
- G. Lindblad, Communications in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 48, 1976, pp. 119-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01608499
- W. S. Warren, Science, Vol. 277, 1997, pp. 1688-1690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5332.1688
- L. M. L. Vandersypen, M. Steffen, G. Breyta, C. S. Yannoni, M. H. Sherwood and I. L. Chuang, Nature, Vol. 414, 2001, p. 883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/414883a
- M. H. Holzschelter, Los Alamos Science, Vol. 27, 2002, p. 264.
- C. Monroe and J. Kim, Science, 2013, Vol. 339, p. 1164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1231298
- H. Walter, B. T. H. Varcoe, B. G. Englert and T. Becker, Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 69, 2006, p. 1325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/69/5/R02
- D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Coté and M. D. Lukin, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 85, 2000, pp. 2208-2211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2208
- K. C. Younge, B. Knuffman, S. E. Anderson and G. Raithel, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 104, 2010, Article ID: 173001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.173001
- I. Chiorescu, Y. Nakamura, C. J. P. M. Harmans and J. E. Mooij, Science, Vol. 299, 2003, pp. 1869-1871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1081045
- A. Yu. Kitaev, Annals of Physics, Vol. 303, 2003, pp. 2-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0
- L. Childress and R. Hanson, MRS Bulletin, Vol. 38, 2013, pp. 134-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2013.20