Mach’s Principle, Action at a Distance and Cosmology
- 1 Department of Physics, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, USA
Abstract
Hoyle and Narlikar (HN) in the 1960’s [1] 08D0C9EA79F9BACE118C8200AA004BA90B02000000080000000E0000005F005200650066003400310031003900330036003000340034000000 - [3] 08D0C9EA79F9BACE118C8200AA004BA90B02000000080000000E0000005F005200650066003400310031003900330036003000340037000000 developed a theory of gravitation which was completely Machian and used both retarded and advanced waves to communicate gravitational influence between particles. The advanced waves, which travel backward in time, are difficult to visualize and although they are mathematically allowed by relativistic wave equations, they never really caught on. The HN theory reduced to Einstein’s theory of gravity in the smooth fluid approximation and a transformation into the rest frame of the fluid. Hawking [4] 08D0C9EA79F9BACE118C8200AA004BA90B02000000080000000E0000005F005200650066003400310031003900330036003000350030000000 in 1965 pointed out a possible flaw in the theory. This involved integrating out into the distant future to account for all the advanced waves which might influence the mass of a particle here and now. Hawking used infinity as his upper time limit and showed the integral was divergent. We point out that since the universe is known to be expanding, and accelerating, the upper limit in the advanced wave time integral should not be infinite but is bounded by the Cosmic Event Horizon. This event horizon H e represents a barrier between future events that can be observed and those which cannot. We show that the advanced wave integral is finite when H e / C , is used as the upper limit of the advanced wave integral. Hawking’s objection is no longer valid and the HN theory becomes a working theory once again.
- Hoyle, F. and Narlikar, J.V. (1964) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 282, 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1964.0227
- Hoyle, F. and Narlikar, J.V. (1964) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 282, 184. Hoyle, F. and Narlikar, J.V. (1966) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 294, 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1966.0199
- Hoyle, F. and Narlikar, J.V. (1974) Action at a Distance in Physics and Cosmology. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
- Hawking, S.W. (1965) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 286, 313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1965.0146
- Einstein, A. (1912) Vierteljahrsschrift fur Gerichtliche Medizin und Offentliches Sanitatswesen, 44, 37-40. (Translated in English and Reprinted in the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, (CPAE), 4, 126)
- Lynden-Bell, D., Bicak, J. and Katz, J. arXiv:gr-qc/9812033.
- Einstein, A. (1955) The Meaning of Relativity. Princeton.
- Tetrode, H. (1922) Zeitschrift für Physik, 10, 317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01332574
- Fokker, A.D. (1929) Zeitschrift für Physik, 58, 386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01340389
- Dirac, P.A.M. (1938) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 167, 148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0124
- Wheeler, J.A. and Feynman, R.P. (1945) Reviews of Modern Physics, 17, 157-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.17.157
- Lewis, G.N. (1926) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 12, 22-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.12.1.22
- Mehra, J. (1994) The Beat of a Different Drum: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 96.
- Partridge, R.B. (1973) Nature, 244, 263-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/244263a0
- Cramer, J.G. (2014) Private Email Communication.
- Woodward, J.F. (1996) Foundations of Physics Letters, 9, 1-23.
- Ellis, G.F.R. and Rothman, T. (1993) American Journal of Physics, 61, 883-893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.17400
- Weinberg, S. (1972) Gravitation and Cosmology Principles and the Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 472.
- Rindler, W. (1965) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 116, 662-677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/116.6.662