Gravireception in <i>Phycomyces</i>: Threshold Determination on the Sounding Rocket TEXUS 50
- 1 Fachbereich Biologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- 2 Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
Abstract
Under parabolic flight conditions microgravity is not lower than 3 to 5 times 10 -2 g. In contrast to parabolic flights, sounding rocket flights are virtually vibrational-free allowing microgravity as low as 10 -5 g. Thus, a rotating platform serving as centrifuge allows the precise generation of gravitational forces ranging from 5 to 100 mg (not possible during parabolic flights). On this basis we determined the threshold 1 for optical reflection/absorption changes in Phycomyces to be lower than 25 × 10 -3 g. This compares well with the threshold determination of gravitropism in Phycomyces on a clinostat centrifuge. Kinetics of gravity-induced absorption changes and gravity as generated by the on-board centrifuge do not coincide but show a distinctive hysteresis with a latency of 4 s (75 mg-ramp, pull-up).
- Schmidt, W. and Galland, P. (2000) Planta, 210, 848-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004250050689
- Morita, M.T. (2010) Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61, 705-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092042
- Corrochano, L.M. and Galland, P. (2006) Photomorphogenesis and Gravitropism in Fungi. In: Kues, U. and Fischer, R., Eds., The Mycota I, Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 231-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28135-5_13
- Sack, F. (1991) International Review of Cytology, 127, 193-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60695-6
- Kiss, J.Z., Hertel, R. and Sack, F.R. (1989) Planta, 177, 198-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00392808
- Volkmann, D. and Sievers, A. (1979) Graviperception in Multicellular Organs. In: Haupt, W. and Feinleib, M.E., Eds., Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Physiology of Movements, Vol. 7, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 573-600.
- Sack, F. (1997) Planta, 203, 63-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00008116
- Boonsirichai, K., Guan, C., Chen, R. and Masson, P.H. (2002) Annual Review of Plant Biology, 53, 421-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135158
- Dennison, D.S. (1961) The Journal of General Physiology, 45, 23-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.45.1.23
- Dennison, D.S. and Shropshire Jr., W. (1984) The Journal of General Physiology, 84, 845-859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.84.6.845
- Galland, P., Finger, H. and Wallacher, Y. (2004) Journal of Plant Physiology, 161, 733-739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-01082
- Shen-Miller, J., Hinchmann, R.R. and Gordon, S.A. (1968) Plant Physiology, 43, 338-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.43.3.338
- Wabnik, K., Govaerts, W., Friml, J. and Kleine-Vehn, J. (2011) Molecular BioSystems, 7, 2352-2359.
- Blilou, I., Xu, J., Wildwater, M., Willemsen, V., Papanov, I., Friml, J., Heidstra, R., Aöda, M., Palme, K. and Scheres, B. (2005) Nature, 433, 39-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03184
- Schmidt, W. and Galland, P. (2004) Plant Physiology, 135, 183-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.033282
- Kubelka, P. and Munk, F. (1931) Zeitschrift für Technische Physik, 12, 593-601.
- Behrens, H.M., Gradmann, D. and Sievers, A. (1985) Planta, 163, 463-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00392703