A New Quantum Number Triangular Array That Defines the Internal Organization of Valence Quarks, the Hadron Quark Model, and the CKM Matrix
- 1 Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- 2 Retired, Columbus State Community College, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The Harmonic Neutron Hypothesis, HNH, has demonstrated that many of the fundamental physical constants, including the quarks, are associated with partial harmonic fractional exponents, , of a fundamental frequency, v F . The model has shown that the properties of the quarks are based on a progression of prime number composites. They also fall on three separate power law lines related to integer factors of the Y-intercept, , of a fundamental electromagnetic line which is scaled by the Rydberg constant, R and Planck’s constant. The quark lines are scaled by the quantum number factors {1, 2, 3}, and their Y-intercepts are referred to as n bem . The goal is to present a new proto-quark model in a six-quark inverted triangular array that defines the global organization of the valence quarks, which determines the hadronic quantum numbers, the standard hadron quark model, and the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix. Methods: The charm, bottom, top quarks are associated with power law line Y-intercept, n bem equal to 1; the strange and down quarks with n bem equal to 2; and the up quark with n bem equal to 3. An inverted equilateral triangular array with three rows arranged from upper row (triangle base) to bottom row (triangle vertex), is associated respectively with n bem numbers 1, 2, and 3. The novelty of our perspective thus defines a new global valence quark organization which supersedes the Standard hadron composite quark model. The quarks are ordered via relative mass, partial fractions, and n bem quantum number. The top row of our inverted triangle includes the c, b, and t quarks from left to right; the middle row depicts the d and s quarks; and the bottom row, the up quark. Results: Our array depicts a quantum generator of the global organization of the valence quarks defining the composite quark model. The vertices of the triangular array are the up quarks, the midpoints are the down quarks. All weak transitions are from a corner to a midpoint or vice versa. The standard 3 by 3 CKM matrix is generated from the new quark triangle with each up type quark (u, c, and t) transforming to each down type (d, s, and b), with their experimental flavor transition magnitudes given. Conclusion: A new quark quantum number, n bem , is an important discovery that generates a new proto-valence quark triangle that secondarily generates the composite quark model and the CKM matrix.
- Beringer, J. (Particle Data Group), et al. (2012) Physical Review D, 86, 010001. http://pdg.lbl.gov
- Gell-Mann, M. (1964) The Eightfold Way: A Theory of Strong Interaction Symmetry. In: Gell-Mann, M. and Ne’eman, Y., Eds., The Eightfold Way, Westview Press, Boudler.
- Griffiths, J.D. (2008) Introduction to Elementary Particles. 2nd Edition, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
- Oerter, R. (2006) The Theory of Almost Everything: The Standard Model, the Unsung Triumph of Modern Physics. Kindle Edition, Penguin Group, London, 2.
- Braibant, S., Giacomelli, G. and Spurio, M. (2009) Particles and Fundamental Interactions: An Introduction to Particle Physics. Springer, New York, 313-314.
- Sitnikov, L.S. (2013) Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 1604-1607. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.412198
- Liang, B. (2015) Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 982-989. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2015.67102
- Hage-Hassan, M. (2013) A Note on Quarks and Numbers Theory. http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6342
- Weinberg, S. (1975) Phys. Rev. D, 11, 3583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3583
- Shup, M.A. (1979) Physics Letters B, 86, 87-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90627-0
- Koide, Y. (1983) Physics Letters B, 120, 161-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)90644-5
- Greenberg, O.W., Mohapatra, R.N. and Yasuè, M. (1983) Physical Review Letters, 51, 1737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1737
- Koide, Y. (1982) Lettere al Nuovo Cimento Giugno, 34, 201-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02817096
- Cabibbo, N. (1963) Physical Review Letters, 10, 531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.531
- Kobayashi, M. and Maskawa, T. (1973) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 49, 652-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.49.652
- Beringer, J., et al. (2012) Physical Review D, 80, 1.
- Newman, M.E.J. (2005) Contemporary Physics, 46, 323-351. http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0412004
- Chakeres, D.W. and Vento, R. (2015) Advances in Pure Mathematics, 5, 240-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/apm.2015.55025
- Chakeres, D.W. (2009) Particle Physics Insights, 2, 1-20.