Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatment for Renal and Ureteral Stones in Duhok City
- 1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho, Iraq
- 2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho, Iraq
- 3 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho, Iraq
- 4 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho, Iraq
Abstract
The present study reports the results of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy treatment for renal and ureteral stones in Duhok city. The data were collected from the center of breakdown kidney stones in Duhok hospital. There were a total of 40 patients (25 males and 15 females) aged from 20 to 60 years old. The patients harboring (23 renal and 17 ureteral) stones of size ranged from 7.5 to 20 mm. Almost stones are of average size 9 mm and composed of uric acid, calcium and cystine stones. The study has been carried out by taking into consideration the parameters (type, sizes, composition and location of stone as well as region and ages of patients, also power, number of shock wave and sessions). The results show that the stones size increases according to increasing ages of patients (male and female) for uric acid ureter stone and calcium (renal, ureter) stones. Also (renal, ureter) stone size for patients aged from 20 to 30 years old increases from the minimum value for phosphate to maximum value for cystine stones, while for patients aged from 40 to 60 years old, the minimum size is obtained for calcium oxalate and the maximum size for calcium only. On the other hand, for uric acid stones of average size 9 mm, number of shock wave and sessions as well as the power required to breakdown the stones decrease nearly exponentially according to enhancing patients’ ages. At the same time, it's found that for adult patients (20 - 30 years old), number of sessions and the power of shock wave decrease also according to increasing size of calcium and cystine stones. Contrary to that, for the same ages and renal, uretral cysteine stones number of shock wave needed to breakdown large stones will be increased.
- Urolo, O. and Mohd, A.N. (2006) Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy. Health Technology Assessment Unit, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
- Haecker, A. and Wess, O. (2009) The Role of Focal Size in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. Research Signpost, 37/661 (2), Fort P.O.Trivandrum.
- Wazir, B.G., Iftikhar ul Haq, M., Faheem ul Haq, Nawaz, A., Ikramullah, A.N. and Jamil, M. (2010) Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 22, 20-22.
- Rassweiler, J.J., Knoll, T., Köhrmann, K.U., McAteer, J.A., Lingeman, J.E., Cleveland, R.O., Bailey, M.R. and Chaussy, C. (2011) European Urology, 59, 784-796.
- Bach, C., Karalides, T. and Buchhtz, N. (2012) Arab Journal of Urology, 10, 289-296.
- Kurt, S., Tokgöz, Ö., Tokgöz, H. and Voyvoda, N. (2013) Medical Ultrasonography, 15, 273-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.154.sk2
- Akin, Y. and Yucel, S. (2014) Research and Reports in Urology, 6, 21-25.
- Abid, A.F. (2014) Open Journal of Urology, 4, 26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oju.2014.43005
- Akbar, A.A., Mahmood, S. and Majid, A. (2015) The Professional Medical Journal, 22, 31-35.
- Takazawa, R., Kitayama, S. and Tsujii, T. (2015) World Journal of Nephrology, 4, 111-117
- Gallagher, H.J. and Tolley, D.A. (2000) Current Opinion in Urology, 10, 551-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00042307-200011000-00003
- Kovacevic-Prstojevic, J. (2014) Broj vantjelesnih razbijanja kamenaca uodnosu na velicinu kamenca, njegovu lokalizaciju u urinarnomtraktu, te morfolosku strukturu kamenca. Magistarski rad. Medicinski fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu. Sarajevo.
- El-Nahas, A.R., El-Assmy, A.M., Awad, B.A., Elhalwagy, S.M., Elshal, A.M. and Sheir, K.Z. (2013) International Journal of Urology, 20, 1205-1210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.12132
- Grasso, M., Hsu, J. and Spaliviero, M. (2008) Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy. Emedicine by WebMD.
- Manu, R. (1998) Litotripsia extracorporeala cu unde de soc (ESWL). In: Sinescu, I., et al., Eds., Urologie Clinica, Editura Medicala Amaltea, Bucuresti, 162-164.
- Tiselius, H.G., Ackermann, D., Alken, P., Buck, C., Conort, P. and Galluci, M. (2001) European Urology, 40, 362-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000049803