Quantum Interference without Wave-Particle Duality
- 1 Physics School, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
- 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 3 CNR—Istituto Officina dei Materiali, Trieste, Italy
Abstract
Interference of light and material particles is described with a unified model which does not need to assume the wave-particle duality. A moving particle is associated with a region of spatial correlated points named coherence cone. Its geometry depends on photon or particle momentum and on the parameters of the experimental setup. The final interference pattern is explained as a spatial distribution of particles caused by the coherence cone geometry. In the present context, the wave front superposition principle, wave-particle duality and wave-collapse lose their meaning. Fits of observed single electron and single molecule interference patterns together with the simulation of expected near-field molecule interference (Talbot carpet) demonstrate the model validity.
- Mandel, L. and Wolf, E. (1995) Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644105
- Castañeda, R. (2014) Physical Review A, 89, Article ID: 013843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.013843
- Philippidis, C., Dewdney, D. and Hiley, B.J. (1979) Il Nuovo Cimento B, 52, 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02743566
- Couder, Y. and Fort, E. (2006) Physical Review Letters, 97, Article ID: 154101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.154101
- Kocsis, S., Braverman, B., et al. (2011) Science, 332, 1170-1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1202218
- Gondran, M. and Gondran, A. (2005) American Journal of Physics, 73, 507-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1858484
- Sanz, A.S. and Miret-Artes, S. (2012) A Trajectory Description of Quantum Processes. II. Applications. Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 831, Springer, Berlin.
- Frabboni, S., Gabrielli, A., Gazzadi, G.C., et al. (2012) Ultramicroscopy, 116, 73-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.017
- Matteucci, G., Pezzi, M., et al. (2013) European Journal of Physics, 34, 511-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/3/511
- Matteucci, G. (2013) Proceedings of SPIE, 8785, 8785CF-1.
- Juffmann, T., Milic, A., et al. (2012) Nature NanoTechnology, 7, 297-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.34
- Arndt, M., Nairz, O., et al. (1999) Nature, 401, 680-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/44348
- Nalrz, O., Arndt, M., et al. (2003) American Journal of Physics, 71, 319-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1531580
- Juffmann, T., Truppe, S., Geyer, P., et al. (2009) Physical Review Letters, 103, Article ID: 263601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.263601
- Iannotta, S. and Toccoli, T. (2003) Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, 41, 2501-2521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.10644
- Born, M. and Wolf, E. (1993) Principles of Optics. 6th Edition, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Matteucci, G., Castañeda, R., et al. (2010) European Journal of Physics, 31, 347-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/31/2/012