The Bell Inequality Is Satisfied by Quantum Correlations Computed Consistently with Quantum Non-Commutation
- 1 Institute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA & Burtonsville, MD, USA
- 2 Inspire Institute Inc., Alexandria, VA, USA
Abstract
In constructing his theorem, Bell assumed that correlation functions among non-commuting variables are the same as those among commuting variables. However, in quantum mechanics, multiple data values exist simultaneously for commuting operations while for non-commuting operations data are conditional on prior outcomes, or may be predicted as alternative outcomes of the non-commuting operations. Given these qualitative differences, there is no reason why correlation functions among non-commuting variables should be the same as those among commuting variables, as assumed by Bell. When data for commuting and noncommuting operations are predicted from quantum mechanics, their correlations are different, and they now satisfy the Bell inequality.
- Sica, L. (2013) Applied Mathematics, 4, 90-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.410A3012
- Bell, J.S. (1964) Physics, 1, 195-200.
- Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. and Roger, G. (1982) Physical Review Letters, 49, 1804-1807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804
- Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H. and Zeilinger, A. (1998) Physical Review Letters, 81, 5039-5043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039
- de la Peña, L., Cetto, A.M. and Brody, T.A. (1972) Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 5, 177-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02815921
- Bell, J.S. (1987) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 65.
- Papoulis, A. and Pillai, S.U. (2002) Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, Chap. 9.
- Sica, L. (2003) Journal of Modern Optics, 50, 2465-2474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500340308233577
- Hess, K. (2015) Einstein Was Right. Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd., Singapore.
- Malley, J.D. (2004) Physical Review A, 69, Article ID: 022118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.022118
- De Raedt, H., Jin, F. and Michielsen, K. (2013) Data Analysis of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Laboratory Experiments. arXiv:1312.6361v1 [quant-ph].
- Boole, G. (1862) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 152, 225-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1862.0015
- Eberhard, P.H. (1977) Il Nuovo Cimento B, 38B, 75-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02726212
- Laloe, F. (2012) Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177160
- Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Gisin, T., Herzog, T., Zbinden, H. and Gisin, N. (1998) Physical Review A, 57, 3229-3232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3229
- Mandl, F. (1992) Quantum Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chap. 5.
- Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A. and Holt, R.A. (1969) Physical Review Letters, 23, 880-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
- Sica, L. (2002) Foundations of Physics Letters, 15, 473-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023920230595