Memory Effect in Chemotaxis Equation
- 1 Department of Physics, Dyal Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
- 2 Department of Physics, Dyal Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
- 3 Department of Physics, Dyal Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
- 4 Department of Physics, Dyal Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
- 5 Department of Physics, Dyal Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Abstract
Diffusion-Reaction (DR) equation has been used to model a large number of phenomena in nature. It may be mentioned that a linear diffusion equation does not exhibit any traveling wave solution. But there are a vast number of phenomena in different branches not only of science but also of social sciences where diffusion plays an important role and the underlying dynamical system exhibits traveling wave features. In contrast to the simple diffusion when the reaction kinetics is combined with diffusion, traveling waves of chemical concentration are found to exist. This can affect a biochemical change, very much faster than straight diffusional processes. This kind of coupling results into a nonlinear (NL) DR equation. In recent years, memory effect in DR equation has been found to play an important role in many branches of science. The effect of memory enters into the dynamics of NL DR equation through its influence on the speed of the travelling wavefront. In the present work, chemotaxis equation with source term is studied in the presence of finite memory and its solution is compared with the corresponding chemotaxis equation without finite memory. Also, a comparison is made between Fisher-Burger equation and chemotaxis equation in the presence of finite memory. We have shown that nonlinear diffusion-reaction-convection equation is equivalent to chemotaxis equation.
- Murray, J.D. (1993) Mathematical Biology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Cattaneo, C. (1958) Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 247, 431-433.
- Abramson, G., Bishop, A.R. and Kenkre, V.M. (2001) Physical Review E, 64, 066615.
- Kar, S., Banik, S.K. and Ray, D.S. (2002) Physical Review E, 65, 061909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.061909
- Kar, S., Banik, S.K. and Ray, D.S. (2003) Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36, 2771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/36/11/308
- Mishra, A. and Kumar, R. (2012) Physical Review A, 376, 1833.
- Méndez, V. and Llebot, J.E. (1997) Physical Review E, 56, 6557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.56.6557
- Méndez, V. andCamacho, J. (1997) Physical Review E, 55, 6476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.55.6476
- Caputo, M. and Gloria-Bottini, F. (2011) Natural Science, 3, 694-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ns.2011.38093
- Caputo, M. and Cametti, C. (2009) Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 42, 125505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/12/125505
- Franosch, T. and Nelson, D.R. (2000) Journal of Statistical Physics, 99, 1021-1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018607932123
- Mishra, A. and Kumar, R. (2010) Physics Letters A, 374, 2921-2924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2010.03.039
- Gilding, B.H. and Kersner, R. (2004) Traveling Waves in Nonlinear Diffusion-Convection Reaction. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7964-4
- Debnath, L. (1997) Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers. Birkhäuser, Boston. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2846-7
- Benguria, R.D., Depassier, M.C. and Méndez, V. (2004) Physical Review E, 69, 031106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.031106
- Keller, E.F. and Segel, L.A. (1971) Journal of Theoretical Biology, 30, 235-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90051-8
- Rosen, G. (1976) Journal of Theoretical Biology, 59, 371-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(76)90177-6
- Sherratt, J.A. (1994) Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 56, 129-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02458292