NO<sub>2</sub> Excited State Properties Revisited: An Effect of Extra Compactified Dimensions
- 1 Heinrich-Hertz-Institut, Einsteinufer 37, Berlin, Germany
- 2 Sudetenstr. 16, Amorbach, Germany
Abstract
Experiments on NO 2 reveal a substructure underlying the optically excited isolated hyperfine structure (hfs) levels of the molecule. This substructure is seen in a change of the symmetry of the excited molecule and is represented by the two “states” and of a hfs-level. Optical excitation induces a transition from the ground state of the molecule to the excited state . However, the molecule evolves from to in a time τ 0 ≈ 3 μ s. Both and have the radiative lifetime τ R ≈ 40 μ s, but and differ in the degree of polarization of the fluorescence light. Zeeman coherence in the magnetic sublevels is conserved in the transition → , and optical coherence of and is able to affect (inversion effect) the transition → . This substructure, which is not caused by collisions with baryonic matter or by intramolecular dynamics in the molecule, contradicts our knowledge on an isolated hfs-level. We describe the experimental results using the assumption of extra dimensions with a compactification space of the size of the molecule, in which dark matter affects the nuclei by gravity. In , all nuclei of NO 2 are confined in a single compactification space, and in , the two O nuclei of NO 2 are in two different compactification spaces. Whereas and represent stable configurations of the nuclei, represents an unstable configuration because the vibrational motion in shifts one of the two O nuclei periodically off the common compactification space, enabling dark matter interaction to stimulate the transition → with the rate ( τ 0 ) − 1 . We revisit experimental results, which were not understood before, and we give a consistent description of these results based on the above assumption.
- Weber, H.G. (1988) Physical Letters A, 129, 355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(88)90001-1
- Weber, H.G. (2015) Physical Letters A, 379, 1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.03.008
- Sanrey, M. and Joyeux, M. (2007) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 126, 074301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2446920
- Ruf, H., et al. (2012) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 137, 224303. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4768810
- Cheshnovsky, O. and Amirav, A. (1984) Chemical Physics Letters, 109, 368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(84)85603-1
- Weber, H.G. (1985) Physical Review A, 31, 1488. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1488
- Bylicki, F., Weber, H.G., Zscheeg, H. and Arnold, M. (1984) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 80, 1791. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.446936
- Weber, H.G. (1986) Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters, 1, 403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01431183
- Weber, H.G. and Miksch, G. (1985) Physical Review A, 31, 1477. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1477
- Donnelly, V.M. and Kaufman, F. (1978) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 69, 1456. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.436770
- Douglas, A.E. (1966) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 45, 1007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1727650
- Bixon, M. and Jortner, J. (1969) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 50, 3284. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1671552
- Weber, H.G. (2015) Chemical Physics Letters, 639, 243.
- Graham, P.W. and Rajendran, S. (2011) Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 055013. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.055013
- Roberts, B.M., Stadnik, Y.V., Dzuba, V.A., Flambaum, V.V., Leefer, N. and Budker, D. (2014) Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 096005. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.096005
- Vavra, J. (2014) Physics Letters B, 736, 169.
- Borsanyi, S., et al. (2016) Nature, 539, 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20115
- Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S. and Dvali, G. (1998) Physics Letters B, 429, 263-272.
- Antoniadis, I., Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S. and Dvali, G. (1998) Physics Letters B, 436, 257.
- Svrcek, P. and Witten, E. (2006) JHEP, 0606, 051.