Speed of Gravitation and Electromagnetic Waves through the Dark Energy of Intergalactic Space and Its Implications of a Unified Theory
- 1 San Diego, CA, USA
Abstract
The recent finding that gravitational waves (GW170817) traveled at the same speed as electromagnetic (EM) waves (GRB 170817A) from a binary neutron star merger does not necessarily mean that they traveled throughout their journey at speed c . Some recent works by the author (2015) Journal of Modern Physics , 6, 78-87, and 1360-1370; (2016), 7, 1829-1844; (2017), 8, 622-635 show that the diminished brightness of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) can be explained by assuming that dark energy, instead of having a negative pressure, has an index of refraction n , causing the speed of light through intergalactic space (IGS) to be reduced to c/n, with n ≈ 1.5. It follows that GWs (not considered in the previous works) would also travel with speed c/n through IGS. However, speed of GWs and EMWs within galaxies themselves is c . A brief review of the model is given, together with other predictions, e.g., new values for the Hubble constant and age of the universe, and necessary absence of correlation of neutrinos with gamma ray bursts (GRBs), in agreement with numerous searches. In the previous works, there were implications of a unified theory. If the model holds, since GWs would experience the same speed reduction as EMWs, this would further support unification. An improved falsification methodology for a previously proposed astronomical test based on discordant redshifts is given.
- Abbott, B.P., et al. (2017) LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration: Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848, L12. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
- Abbott, B.P., et al. (2017) LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration: Physical Review Letters, 119, 161101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
- Goldstein, A., et al. (2017) Fermi-GBM, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848, L14. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f41
- Savchenko, V., et al. (2017) INTEGRAL Collaboration, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848, L15. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f94
- Tangherlini, F.R. (2015) Journal Modern Physics, 6, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2015.61010
- Tangherlini, F.R. (2015) Journal Modern Physics, 6, 1360-1370. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2015.69141
- Tangherlini, F.R. (2016) Journal Modern Physics, 7, 1829-1844. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.713163
- Tangherlini, F.R. (2017) Journal Modern Physics, 8, 622-635. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.84042
- Riess, A.G., et al. (1998) Astronomical Journal, 116, 1009-1038. https://doi.org/10.1086/300499
- Schmidt, B., et al. (1998) Astrophysical Journal, 507, 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1086/306308
- Perlmutter, S., et al. (1999) Astrophysical Journal, 517, 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1086/307221
- Abbasi, R., et al. (2012) IceCube Collaboration: Nature, 484, 351-354. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11068
- Artsen, M.G., et al. (2013) IceCube Collaboration: Physical Review Letters, 111, Article ID: 021103.
- Agostini, M., et al. (2017) Borexino Collaboration, Astroparticle Physics, 86, 1-17.
- Agostini, M., et al. (2017) Borexino Collaboration, Astrophysical Journal, 850, 21.
- Tonry, J.L., et al. (2003) Astrophysical Journal, 594, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1086/376865
- Anderson, L., et al. (2012) Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society, 427, 3435-3457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22066.x
- Anderson, L., et al. (2014) Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society, 439, 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2206
- Riess, A.G., et al. (2001) Astrophysical Journal, 560, 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1086/322348