Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Bell’s Theorem and Instantaneous Influences at a Distance
Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA
- 1 Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA
Journal of Modern Physics·Volume 09 (2018)·Pages 1573–1590·Published 2 July 2018·DOI10.4236/jmp.2018.98099
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
An explicit model-example is presented to simulate Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiments without invoking instantaneous influences at a distance. The model-example, together with the interpretation of past experiments by Kwiat and coworkers, uncovers logical inconsistencies in the application of Bell’s theorem to actual EPR experiments. The inconsistencies originate from topological-combinatorial assumptions that are both necessary and sufficient to derive all Bell-type inequalities including those of Wigner-d’Espagnat and Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt. The model-example circumvents these inconsistencies.
KeywordsBell’s TheoremInstantaneous InfluencesEPRB Experiments
- Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935) Physical Review, 16, 777-780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
- Bell, J.S. (1964) Physics Physique Fizika, 1, 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195
- Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. and Roger, G. (1982) Physical Review Letters, 49, 1804-1807. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804
- Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurther, H. and Zeilinger, A. (1998) Physical Review Letters, 81, 5039-5043. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039
- Kwiat, P.G., Waks, E., Appelbaum, I. and Eberhard, P.A. (1999) Physical Review A, 60, 773-776. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R773
- Bell, J.S. (1976) Epistemological Letters, 2, 2-7.
- Gell-Mann, M. (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 170.
- Scully, M.O., Aharonov, Y. and Englert, B.G. (1999) On the Locality and Reality of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations. In: Bonifacio, R., Ed., AIP, Mysteries, Puzzles and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics, 47-67.
- Hess, K., De Raedt, H.A. and Khrennikov, A., Eds. (2017) Open Physics, 15.
- Hess, K. and Philipp, W. (2004) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 1799-1805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307479100
- Hess, K. and Philipp, W. (2001) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 14224-14227. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251524998
- Hess, K. and Philipp, W. (2005) Foundations of Physics, 35, 1749-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-005-6520-y
- De Raedt, H.A., Michielsen, K. and Hess, K. (2017) Open Physics, 15, 713-733. https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0085
- Muchowski, E. (2017) Open Physics, 15, 891-896. https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0106
- Hess, K., De Raedt, H.A. and Michielsen, K. (2016) Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 1651-1660. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.713150
- Wigner, E.P. (1970) American Journal of Physics, 38, 1005-1009. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1976526
- D’Espagnat, B. (1979) Scientific American, 241, 158-181. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1179-158
- Huang, K. (2007) Fundamental Forces of Nature, the Story of Gauge Fields. World Scientific, London, 76. https://doi.org/10.1142/6447