Superimposing Scales and Doppler-Like Effect
- 1 Retired from the Cracow University of Technology, Kraków, Poland
Abstract
The observable universe together with the observer, both on sufficiently large scale, succeeds in their self-entaglement and paradoxical inconsistency. For consistency, the observable universe and the observer have to be on different scale (size) provided, the cosmological principle is preserved as an approximation in a limit. The point is the univers’ principle itself. Our proposal for the disentaglement is superimposition out of complexity . The distance contraction, as observed in electrical soundings over horizontally stratified earth (static system), is identified as a counterpart of Doppler shift in dynamical systems. An alternative answer to the question about an effective cause of the Doppler shift sounds the heterogeneities under superimposing scales. The energy propagating in stratified universe exhibits a shift which could be attributed not only to the expansion but alternatively to fluctuations across different scales. When nothing is said or predetermined about kinematics of a system, both causes might share in the effect. It opens different static and kinematic possibilities, which challenge established theories of energy/information transmission and/or sounding at a distance as well as pertinent technology in prospect.
- Knisely, L. (2011) Size and Scale of the Unverse. http://wise.ssi.berkeley.edu/documents/ScaleRealmsUniverse.pdf
- Schlumberger, C., Schlumberger, M. and Leonardon, E.G. (1934) Transactions of the AIME, 110, 159-182.
- Maillet, R. and Doll, H.G. (1932) Théorème relatif aux millieux electriquement anisotropes et ses applications à la prospection electrique Ergänzung-Hefte für angewandte Geophysik, III, I, Akademische Verlag, Leipzig, 101-124.
- Cohen, L. (1995) Time-Frequency Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
- Maillet, R. (1947) Geophysics, 12, 529-556. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437342
- Koefoed, O. (1979) Geosounding Principles, 1: Resistivity Sounding Measurements. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
- Szaraniec, E. (1976) Geophysical Prospecting, 24, 528-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1976.tb00953.x
- Szaraniec, E. (1982) Geophysical Prospecting, 30, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1982.tb00418.x
- Orellana, E. (1963) Geophysics, 28, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439158
- Szaraniec, E. (1972) Geophysical Prospecting, 20, 212-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1972.tb00630.x
- Szaraniec, E. (2001) Journal of Seismic Exploration, 9, 199-210.
- Szaraniec, E. (2002) Journal of Seismic Exploration, 10, 341-352.
- Trott, M. (2017) How Laplace Would Hide a Goat: The New Science of Magic Window. https://blog.wolfram.com/author/michael-trott/
- Szaraniec, E. (2003) Doppler-Like Effect and Doubful Expansion of Universe. arXiv: astro-ph/0310023
- Holder, D.S. (Ed.) (2004) Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420034462
- Wikipedia, Raman Spectroscopy.
- Tivari, G. (2018) CV Raman, Raman Effect on Raman Spectroscopy and Raman Scattering. https://guaravtivari.org
- Aiyar, S.A. (2010) Raman Effect: Fingerprinting the Universe. Times of India Blog.