On Topics in Quantum Games
- 1 Department of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- 2 Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto, Japan
Abstract
This work concentrates on simultaneous move non-cooperating quantum games. Part of it is evidently not new, but it is included for the sake self consistence, as it is devoted to introduction of the mathematical and physical grounds of the pertinent topics, and the way in which a simple classical game is modified to become a quantum game (a procedure referred to as a quantization of a classical game ). The connection between game theory and information science is briefly stressed, and the role of quantum entanglement (that plays a central role in the theory of quantum games), is exposed. Armed with these tools, we investigate some basic concepts like the existence (or absence) of a pure strategy and mixed strategy Nash equilibrium and its relation with the degree of entanglement. The main results of this work are as follows: 1) Construction of a numerical algorithm based on the method of best response functions, designed to search for pure strategy Nash equilibrium in quantum games. The formalism is based on the discretization of a continuous variable into a mesh of points, and can be applied to quantum games that are built upon two-players two-strategies classical games, based on the method of best response functions. 2) Application of this algorithm to study the question of how the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibrium is related to the degree of entanglement (specified by a continuous parameter γ ). It is shown that when the classical game G C has a pure strategy Nash equilibrium that is not Pareto efficient, then the quantum game G Q with maximal entanglement ( γ = π/2 ) has no pure strategy Nash equilibrium. By studying a non-symmetric prisoner dilemma game, it is found that there is a critical value 0< γ c <π/2 such that for γ < γ c there is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium and for γ ≥ γ c there is no pure strategy Nash equilibrium. The behavior of the two payoffs as function of γ starts at that of the classical ones at ( D , D ) and approaches the cooperative classical ones at ( C , C ) ( C = confess, D = don’t confess). 3) We then study Bayesian quantum games and show that under certain conditions, there is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium in such games even when entanglement is maximal. 4) We define the basic ingredients of a quantum game based on a two-player three strategies classical game. This requires the introduction of trits (instead of bits) and quantum trits (instead of quantum bits). It is proved that in this quantum game, there is no classical commensurability in the sense that the classical strategies are not obtained as a special case of the quantum strategies.
- Shannon, C.E. (1949) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Evanston.
- Nash, J. (1950) The Bargaining Problem. Econometric, 18, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907266
- Nash, J.F. (1950) Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36, 48-49. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
- Nash, J. (1950) Non-Cooperative Games. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton.
- Nash, J. (1951) Non-Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529
- Nash, J. (1953) Two-Person Cooperative Games. Econometrica, 21, 128-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906951
- von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1953) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Shor, P.W. (1997) Polynomial Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26, Article 1484. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539795293172
- Wiesner, S. (1983) Conjugate Coding. ACM SIGACT News, 15, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1008908.1008920
- Ekert, A.K. (1991) Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell’s Theorem. Physical Review Letters, 67, 661-663. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
- Goldenberg, L., Vaidman, L. and Wiesner, S. (1999) Quantum Gambling. Physical Review Letters, 82, 3356. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3356
- Vaidman, L. (1999) Variations on the Theme of the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger Proof. Foundations of Physics, 29, 615-630. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018868326838
- Meyer, D. (1999) Quantum Strategies. Physical Review Letters, 82, 1052-1055. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1052
- Eisert, J., Wilkens, M. and Lewenstein, M. (1999) Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies. Physical Review Letters, 83, 3077-3080. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3077
- Eisert, J. and Wilkens, M. (2000) Quantum Games. Journal of Modern Optics, 47, 2543-2556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008232180
- Benjamin, S.C. and Hayden, P.M. (2001) Comment on “Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies”. Physical Review Letters, 87, Article ID: 069801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.069801