Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Language:Reconsideration of Traditional Philosophies
- 1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan
Abstract
Recently we proposed “a new interpretation of quantum mechanics (called quantum and classical measurement theory)” in this journal (JQIS: Vol. 1, No. 2), which was characterized as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of quantum mechanics. This turn from physics to language does not only realize the remarkable extension of quantum mechanics but also yield the quantum mechanical world view (i.e., the philosophy of quantum mechanics). And thus, the turn urges us to dream that traditional philosophies (i.e., Parmenides, Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, John Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Saussure, Wittgenstein, etc.) can be understood in the quantum mechanical world view. This dream will be challenged in this paper. We, of course, know that most scientists are skeptical to philosophy. Still, we can expect that readers find a good linguistic philosophy (i.e. philosophy of language) in quantum mechanics.
- S. Ishikawa, “A New Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,” Journal of quantum information science, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2011, pp. 35-42.
- S. Ishikawa, “Fuzzy Inferences by Algebraic Method,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 87, No. 2, 1997, pp. 181- 200. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00035-8
- S. Ishi-kawa, “A Quantum Mechanical Approach to Fuzzy Theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 90, No. 3, 1997, pp. 277-306. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00114-5
- S. Ishikawa, “Sta-tistics in Measurements,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 116, No. 6, 2000, pp. 141-154. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00280-2
- S. Ishikawa, “Mathematical Foundations of Measurement Theory,” Keio University Press Inc., Yokohama, 2006, pp. 1-335. http://www.keio-up.co.jp/kup/mfomt/
- S. Ishikawa, “Dy-namical Systems, Measurements, Quantitative Language and Zeno’s Paradoxes,” Far East Journal of Dynamical Systems, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008, pp. 277-292.
- G. J. Murphy, “C*-Algebras and Operator Theory,” Academic Press, London, 1990.
- J. von Neumann, “Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics,” Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1932.
- E. B. Davies, “Quantum Theory of Open Systems,” Academic Press, London, 1976.
- A. Einstein, B. Podolosky and N. Rosen, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” Physical Review, Vol. 47, No. 10, 1935, pp. 777-780. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
- N. Bohr, “Can Quan-tum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” Physical Review, Vol. 47, No. 8, 1935, pp. 696-702. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.48.696
- K. R. Popper, “The Logic of Scientific Discovery,” Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1959.
- A. Kolmogorov, “Foundations of the Theory of Probability (Translation),” 2nd Edition, Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1960.
- J. M. E. McTaggart, “The Unreality of Time,” Mind (A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philoso-phy), Vol. 17, 1908, pp. 457-474. doi:10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457
- I. Kant, “Critique of Pure Reason,” In: P. Guyer and A. W. Wood, Eds., Cambridge Uni-versity Press, Cambridge, 1999.
- S. Ishikawa, T. Arai and T. Kawai, “Numerical Analysis of Trajectories of a Quantum Particle in Two-Slit Experiment,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 1993, pp. 1265-1274. doi:10.1007/BF00670793