Constructing Entanglers in 2-Players–N-Strategies Quantum Game
- 1 Department of Physics and the Ilse Katz Center for Nano-Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beersheba, Israel
Abstract
In quantum games based on 2-player- N -strategies classical games, each player has a quNit (a normalized vector in an N -dimensional Hilbert space H N ) upon which he applies his strategy (a matrix U ∈ SU( N )). The players draw their payoffs from a state . Here and J (both determined by the game’s referee) are respectively an unentangled 2-quNit (pure) state and a unitary operator such that is partially entangled. The existence of pure strategy Nash equilibrium in the quantum game is intimately related to the degree of entanglement of . Hence, it is practical to design the entangler J = J ( β ) to be dependent on a single real parameter β that controls the degree of entanglement of , such that its von-Neumann entropy S N ( β ) is continuous and obtains any value in . Designing J ( β ) for N =2 is quite standard. Extension to N >2 is not obvious, and here we suggest an algorithm to achieve it. Such construction provides a special quantum gate that should be a useful tool not only in quantum games but, more generally, as a special gate in manipulating quantum information protocols.
- Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L. (2000) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 26, Fig. 1.13.
- Band, Y.B. and Avishai, Y. (2013) Quantum Mechanics with Application to Nanotechnology and Information Science. Academic Press, Waltham, p 217.
- Goldenberg, L., Vaidman, L. and Wiesner, S. (1999) Quantum Gambling. Physical Review Letters, 82, 3356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3356
- Meyer, D. (1999) Quantum Strategies. Physical Review Letters, 82, 1052-1055. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1052
- Eisert, J., Wilkens, M. and Lewenstein, M. (1999) Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies. Physical Review Letters, 83, 3077-3080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3077
- Flitney, A.P. and Abbott, D. (2002) An Introduction to Quantum Game Theory. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 2, R175-R187. arXiv: quant-ph/0208069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219477502000981
- Piotrowski, E.W. andSlaadkowski, J. (2003) An Invitation to Quantum Game Theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 42, 1089-1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025443111388
- Landsburg, S.E. (2004) Quantum Game Theory. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 51, 394-399.
- Iqbal, A. (2004) Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games. Ph.D thesis, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 137 p. arXiv:quant-phys/050317.
- Sharif, P. and Heydari, H. (2014) Quantum Information and Computation, 14, 0295.
- Landsburg, S.E. (2011) Nash Equilibria in Quantum Games. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 139, 4423-4434. arXiv:1110.1351.
- Benjamin, S.C. and Hayden, P.M. (2001) Comment on “Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies”. Physical Review Letters, 87, Article ID: 069801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.069801
- Du, J., Li, H., Xu, X., Han, R. and Zhou, X. (2002) Entanglement Enhanced Multiplayer Quantum Games. Physics Letters A, 302, 229-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01144-1
- Du, J., Xu, X., Li, H., Zhou, X. and Han, R. (2002) Playing Prisoner’s Dilemma with Quantum Rules. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 2, R189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219477502000993
- Flitney, A.P. and Abbott, D. (2003) Advantage of a Quantum Player over a Classical One in 2 × 2 Quantum Games. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 459, 2463-2474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1136