No Quantum Process Can Explain the Existence of the Preferred Basis: Decoherence Is Not Universal
- 1 Société Générale, Boulevard Franck Kupka, Puteaux, France
Abstract
Environment induced decoherence, and other quantum processes, have been proposed in the literature to explain the apparent spontaneous selection—out of the many mathematically eligible bases—of a privileged measurement basis that corresponds to what we actually observe. This paper describes such processes, and demonstrates that—contrary to common belief—no such process can actually lead to a preferred basis in general. The key observation is that environment induced decoherence implicitly assumes a prior independence of the observed system, the observer and the environment. However, such independence cannot be guaranteed, and we show that environment induced decoherence does not succeed in establishing a preferred measurement basis in general. We conclude that the existence of the preferred basis must be postulated in quantum mechanics, and that changing the basis for a measurement is, and must be, described as an actual physical process.
- Zurek, W.H. (1981) Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? Physical Review D, 24, 1516-1525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1516
- Zurek, W.H. (1991) Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical. Physics Today, 44, 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.881293
- Zurek, W.H. (2002) Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revi-sited. Los Alamos Science, 27, 2-25.
- Schlosshauer, M. (2005) Decoherence, the Measurement Problem, and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 1267-1305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267
- Zeh, H.D. (1970) On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory. Foundations of Physics, 1, 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00708656
- Wang, T. and Hobill, D. (2014) Is the Preferred Basis Selected by the Environment? arXiv:quant-ph/1412.2852
- Zurek, W.H. (1981) Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? Physical Review D, 24, 1519, Section III. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1516
- Bell, J.S. (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics, 1, Article ID: 195200.
- Inamori, H. (2016) Is Independent Choice Possible? Journal of Quantum Information Science, 6, 39-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2016.61005
- Mintert, F., Vinviescas, C. and Buchleitner, A. (2009) Basic Concepts of Entangled States. Lecture Notes in Physics, 768, 61-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88169-8_2