Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A Simple Security Proof for Entanglement-Based Quantum Key Distribution
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana
- 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana
Journal of Quantum Information Science·Volume 06 (2016)·Pages 296–303·Published 31 October 2016·DOI10.4236/jqis.2016.64018
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Quantum cryptography exploits the quantum mechanical properties of communication lines to enhance the security of the so-called key distribution. In this work, we explain the role played by quantum mechanics in cryptographic tasks and also investigate how secure is quantum cryptography. More importantly, we show by a simple security proof that for any state sent by the sender, the eavesdropper can only guess the output state with a probability that will allow her not to learn more than half of the classical Shannon information shared between the legitimate parties. This implies that with high probability, the shared key is secure.
KeywordsQuantum Key DistributionSimple Security ProofEntanglement-BasedQuantum CryptographyPolarisation
- Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W. and Zbinden, H. (2002) Quantum Cryptography. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145
- Weisner, S. (1983) Conjugate Coding. ACM SIGACT News, 15, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1008908.1008920
- Bennett, C.H. (1984) Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Tossing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 175, 7-11.
- Ekert, A. (1991) Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell’s Theorem. Physical Review Letters, 67, 661-663. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
- Bell, J. (1964) On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics, 1, 195-200.
- Bennett, C.H. (1992) Quantum Cryptography Using Any Two Nonorthogonal States. Physical Review Letters, 68, 3121-3124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3121
- Bruß, D. (1998) Optimal Eavesdropping in Quantum Cryptography with Six States. Physical Review Letters, 81, 3018-3021. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018
- Phoenix, S.J., Barnett, S.M. and Chefles, A. (2000) Three-State Quantum Cryptography. Journal of Modern Optics, 47, 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008244056
- Scarani, V., Acn, A., Ribordy, G. and Gisin, N. (2004) Quantum Cryptography Protocols Robust against Photon Number Splitting Attacks for Weak Laser Pulse Implementations. Physical Review Letters, 92, Article ID: 057901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.057901
- Scarani, V., Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H., Cerf, N., Dusek, M., Lütkenhaus, N. and Peev, M. (2009) The Security of Practical Quantum Key Distribution. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 1301-1350. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301
- Mayers, D. (1996) Unconditional Security in Quantum Cryptography. Journal of the ACM, 48, 351-406. https://doi.org/10.1145/382780.382781
- Shor, P. and Preskill, J. (2000) Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol. Physical Review Letters, 85, 441-444. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441
- Mafu, M., Marais, A. and Petruccione, F. (2014) A Necessary Condition for the Security of Coherent-One-Way Quantum Key Distribution Protocol. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 8, 2769-2773. https://doi.org/10.12785/amis/080612
- Scarani, V. and Renner, R. (2008) Quantum Cryptography with Finite Resources: Unconditional Security Bound for Discrete-Variable Protocols with One-Way Postprocessing. Physical Review Letters, 100, Article ID: 200501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.200501