Evaluation of the Cooking Cultures and Practices in Rural Uganda
- 1 Section of Industrial Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 2 Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 3 School of Women and Gender Studies, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 4 Section of Industrial Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 5 Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 6 Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Agricultural Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
Abstract
Many communities across the globe still practice poor cooking cultures as part of their well-being to prepare food and other heating activities. Such bad cooking practices are not environmentally friendly, are wasteful and have adverse health effects. This work presents the results of the survey that was conducted to establish the existing cooking practices commonly used in Uganda, identify the commonly used fuel during cooking, identify perceptions on improved cooking stoves (ICS), perceived preferences during cooking as well as identify whether users are aware of the health challenges due to poor cooking and describe community opinions of ICS for rural communities in Uganda. The interviews were conducted on household levels across all the regions covering Uganda’s major rural regions. It was observed that the largest population of rural Ugandans still use the 3 stone stove fire for cooking with a percentage of 53.5%, Charcoal stove, 27.3%, Improved cooking stove, 16.9%, Electric cookers,1.2%, LPG 0.7% and biogas 0.5% for the preparation of their various types of cooked foods while forest firewood is the commonly used biomass fuel for cooking with a percentage of 66.8% compared to Charcoal, Briquettes, Saw dust and others with a percentage of 27.1%, 0.7%, 0.7%, 1.1% respectively. This reveals the great majority of users whose life is at risk as 3 stone stoves are characterized by low efficiency and high smoke production which increases the health risks of the users as well as increase the risk of deforestation rates. Household cooks showed great willingness to pay for a novel stove type in all the 4 regions but from the survey data, it was indicated that the preferences varied from one region to another with a great majority preferring minimal smoke production with increased heat retention capacity. It was revealed that 91.4% of the interviewed households were aware of the health challenges due to poor cooking methods which they resolve d by using open space during cooking. There was variation in the quantity of food cooked in a day, time spent on cooking and how often the cooking is done from one region to another due to the difference in economic activities as well as the different climate factors. While using cooking stoves, users preferred large cooking pot space with minimal smoke production and rapid heating. Such information can act as a basis for the design of an improved cooking stove for the rural Ugandan community as engineered products must be designed to suit the needs of the end-user.
- Chen, B.R. (2013) Design and Development of a Low-Cost, Electricity-Generating Cooking. Journal of Power and Energy, 227, 803-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650913498733
- Ehsana, M.S. (2015) Performance of an Electricity-Generating Cooking Stove with Pressurized Kerosene Burner. Procedia Engineering, 105, 619-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.05.040
- O’Shaughnessy, S.D. (2012) Small Scale Electricity Generation from a Portable Biomass Cookstove: Prototype Design and Preliminary Results. Applied Energy, 102, 374-385.
- Adkins, E. (2010) Field Testing and Survey Evaluation of Household Biomass Cookstove in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 14, 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2010.07.003
- Ritchie, H. (2019) Indoor Air Pollution. https://ourworldindata.org
- Bukola, O. (2012) Effects of Unsustainable Use of Biomass Energy for Cooking and Strategies for Their Reduction in Developing Countries. Developing Country Studies, 2, 19-25.
- WHO (2016) Global Estimates of Burden of Disease Caused by the Environment and Occupational Risks. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/global/en
- Clougherty, J. (2010) A Growing Role for Gender Analysis in Air Pollution Epidemiology. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900994
- Piedrahita, R., Dickinson, K., Kanyomse, E., Coffey, E., Alirigia, R., Hagar, Y., et al. (2016) Assessment of Cookstoves Stacking in Northern Ghana Using Surveys and Stove Use Monitors. Energy for Sustainable Development, 34, 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.07.007
- Shan, M., Carter, E., Baumgartner, J., Deng, M., Clark, S. and Schauer, J. (2017) A User-Centered, Iterative Engineering Approach for Advanced Biomass Cookstove Design and Development. IOP Publishing Ltd., Bristol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa804f
- O’Shaughnessy, S.J. (2014) Field Trial Testing of an Electricity-Producing Portable Biomass Cooking Stove in Rural Malawi. Energy for Sustainable Development, 20, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.01.009
- UNHCR (2016) Uganda Energy and Environment Program Strategy. UNHCR Uganda Energy and Environment Programme Strategy, 2016-2020.
- (2013) Uganda National Environment Management Authority Report. http://nema.go.ug/content/strategy-and-planning-nema’s-annual-corporate-report-fy201314