Context-Based Recommendation Approach for Measurement and Evaluation Projects
- 1
- 2
- 3
Abstract
Data, information and knowledge are recognized as useful assets for analysis, recommendation and decision making at any business level of an organization. Providing the right information for decision making considering different user-requirements, projects and situations is, however, a difficult issue. A frequently-neglected challenge is to cope with the influence of contextual issues affecting the success of outcomes and decisions. Particularly, when conducting quality evaluations in software organizations, it is of paramount importance to identify beforehand the contextual issues affecting outcomes and interpretations for measurement and evaluation projects. Therefore, the relevant context information should be clearly identified, specified and recorded for performing more robust analysis and recommendations. In this work, a domain-independent context model and a mechanism to integrate it to any application domain is presented. The context model is built upon a measurement and evaluation framework enabling quantification and semantic capabilities. The context model is then integrated in the mentioned framework itself to enable recommendations in meas- urement and evaluation projects.
- M. Baldauf, S. Dustdar and F. Rosenberg, “A Survey on Context-Aware Systems,” International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2007, pp. 263-277. doi:10.1504/IJAHUC.2007.014070
- L. Olsina, H. Molina and F. Papa, “How to Measure and Evaluate Web Applications in a Consistent Way,” Web Engineering: Modelling and Implementing Web Applications, G. Rossi, O. Pastor, D. Schwabe and L. Olsina, Editors, Springer, London, 2008, pp. 385-420. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-923-1_13.
- L. C. Briand, S. Morasca and V. R. Basili, “An Operational Process for Goal-Driven Definition of Measures,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 12, 2002, pp. 1106-1125. doi:10.1109/TSE.2002.1158285
- C. Gresse, B. Hoisl and J. Wüst, “A Process Model for QGM-Based Measurement,” Gresse et al., 1995.
- ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 15939: 2002—Software Engineering—Software Measurement Process, 2002.
- R. E. Park, W. B. Goethert and W. A. Florac, “Goal-Driven Software Measurement: A Guidebook,” Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15213, 1996.
- A. Abran, A. Sellami and W. Suryn, “Metrology, Measurement and Metrics,” 9th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS 2003), Sydney, September 2003, 2003, pp. 2-11.
- CMMI Product Team, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.2,” Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15213, 2006.
- ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 14598-1: 1999—Information Technology—Software Product Evaluation—Part 1: General Overview, 1999.
- B. A. Kitchenham, R. T. Hughes and S. G. Linkman, “Modeling Software Measurement Data,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 9, 2001, pp. 788-804. doi:10.1109/32.950316
- H. Molina and L. Olsina, “Assessing Web Applications Consistently: A Context Information Approach Web En- gineering,” 2008 ICWE’08. Eighth International Confer- ence on Web Engineering, 2008, pp. 224-230. doi: 10.1109/ICWE.2008.21
- A. K. Dey, “Understanding and Using Context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2001, pp. 4-7. doi:10.1007/s007790170019
- L. Gong, “Contextual Modeling and Applications,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cyber- netics, 2005, pp. 381-386. doi:10.1109/ICSMC.2005. 1571176
- J. W. Kaltz, J. Ziegler and S. Lohmann, “Context-Aware Web Engineering: Modeling and Applications,” RIA Re- vue d’Intelligence Artificielle, Special Issue on Applying Context Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2005, pp. 439-458.